Stupak vs. The Nuns

Stupak vs. The Nuns

Just how many saved lives does he have to oppose before Stupak’s stripped of the term "pro-life" once and for all?

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Poor Bart Stupak. Apparently his life has become a living hell.

That’s according to a recent profile in The Hill. Ever since he started trying to hold health care reform for ransom over abortion, he’s had to deal with critics. He’s had to deal, for example, with receiving letters from religious leaders representing 59,000 Catholic nuns.

Of the letters sent to Congress this week calling the health care reform bill “the real pro-life stance,” Stupak said, "When I’m drafting right to life language, I don’t call up the nuns.”

They’re only women, after all. Women, as Jodi Jacobson at RH Reality Check notes, who do the real work of ministering to women in need.

Stupak’s clearly worried that his anti-reform stance may turn out to be the petard on which he hoisted his career. It’s possible, but really it’s not, actually, about him — or even the President, or the Democrats.

It’s about people’s health. Will the Senate bill give more people more access to insurance? Probably. Will they be able to afford it? That’s an open question. But will it save lives? No doubt. And that was the nuns’ point.

Just how many saved lives does he have to oppose before Stupak’s stripped of the term "pro-life" once and for all?

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x