Gonzales: The Dutiful Toady

Gonzales: The Dutiful Toady

As Congressional testimony reveals Alberto Gonzales’s loathsome behavior as Attorney General, remember he was carrying out the wishes of George W. Bush.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Let me offer a word in defense of Alberto R. Gonzales now that a majority of US senators, including six Republicans, are poised to demand his resignation as the nation’s top law enforcement officer. The breaking point was last week’s revelation by former Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey that Gonzales paid a rude, nighttime visit to then-US Attorney General John Ashcroft’s intensive-care hospital room.

The goal of bursting into the hospital and alarming Ashcroft’s wife, in a scene reminiscent of The Godfather, was to obtain the signature of the semiconscious attorney general upon a document renewing an electronic eavesdropping program that Ashcroft’s Justice Department had concluded was not legal. Gonzales had lied about this secret program in Senate testimony when he claimed that it was not regarded as controversial within the Administration; actually, it was so controversial that officials at Justice, from the attorney general to the FBI director, had threatened to resign in protest, if it were renewed.

But don’t blame Gonzales; he’s just another lightweight zealot exploited by the Cheney White House. Not that Gonzales isn’t a thoroughly loathsome character deserving of Senate rebuke and worse. He has been party to dragging this nation down in the eyes of the world, ordering and justifying torture while shredding the limitations on imperious governance that have been the hallmark of American liberty. Yet while the man has been associated with a pernicious assault on our freedoms, he has never been the independent actor, but rather a dutiful toady carrying out the wishes of a tightly monitored White House with the blessings of the President.

That Gonzales was doing the Bush Administration’s bidding, authorized on the highest level, was well documented in last week’s Senate hearing. Gonzales was accompanied by then White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card in his nighttime assault on Ashcroft’s hospital room–a surprise visit which, according to Comey’s testimony, was most likely facilitated by a call from the President to Ashcroft’s wife, who stood in frightened vigil over her husband’s semi-comatose body. After a suddenly alert Ashcroft managed to lift his head from the pillow and condemn their chicanery before lapsing back into semiconsciousness, it was Card who ordered Comey to go immediately to the White House that night for a dressing down for opposing President. And President Bush had a private meeting with Comey the next morning to prevent his imminent resignation, as well as that of the head of the FBI and other top Justice Department officials, including Ashcroft.

In the most damning moment of his testimony, Comey recounted how Ashcroft’s wife, who had banned all visitors from her husband’s room, called the attorney general’s chief of staff, alarmed that she had received a call from the White House informing her that Gonzales and Card were on their way to the hospital. “I was very upset,” Comey recalled. “I thought I had just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man.” When asked if he had an idea where the call came from, Comey testified: “I have some recollection that the call was from the President himself, but I don’t know that for sure. It came from the White House.” In any case, the President clearly didn’t disapprove of Gonzales’s tactics, because he subsequently promoted him to attorney general.

Comey was a highly respected prosecutor before being appointed by Bush to the No. 2 spot at the Justice Department. It should have alarmed Bush that Comey was so worried about Gonzales’s thuggish behavior that he asked FBI Director Robert Mueller to instruct his agents at the hospital not to allow Gonzales to remove Comey from the room, and that Comey would not meet with the White House staff after this incident unless Solicitor General Theodore Olson was present as a witness.

Having researched and written scenes for Oliver Stone’s movie Nixon, a devastating portrait of what we then presumed was the low point in the history of the American presidency, I can well predict the good use that a future screenwriter will make of this hospital scene to document the frightening reality, first effectively outlined in a book by John Dean, that the assault on American representative democracy during the Bush years has been Worse Than Watergate. Dean was the White House counsel who broke with Nixon over that President’s betrayal of the US Constitution and who revealed the truth in a subsequent Senate hearing. By contrast, as Bush’s counsel, Gonzales eagerly abetted White House crime, lied to the Senate and was rewarded for that behavior. The real culprit here, as in Watergate, is the President of the United States.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x