The Strategy Behind Offshore Drilling

The Strategy Behind Offshore Drilling

Grist.org’s Dave Roberts explains why Obama’s endorsement of offshore drilling may not pan out the way he hopes.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Progressives, Democrats and environmentalists are all baffled when it comes to understanding Obama’s proposal to open up offshore drilling. Some have called it sensible middle ground, and others only register a big question mark. Laura Flanders turns to Senior Staff Reporter of Grist.org Dave Roberts to explain what the proposal is all about.

The key is to understand that this was a purely political move and has little to do with energy policy, Roberts explains. Offshore drilling would not substantially lower the price of oil. In fact, Obama has actually restricted the areas available to offshore drilling, since Bush and Congress lifted a moratorium on drilling in 2008. Obama’s strategy behind the proposal is to win three or four Republican votes on comprehensive climate and energy legislation. Roberts describes the proposal as “not quite as bad as it looks…. So if it actually works to bring about comprehensive climate and energy policy, I think it will be a great trade to make.”

Despite the proposal looking not so bad, Roberts doesn’t think endorsing offshore drilling is a smart move. The problem is that Obama is willing to bend on key environmental issues, such as offshore drilling and nuclear power, but he doesn’t demand anything in return. “If I’m a Republican Senator having gotten what I want, what incentive do I now have to compromise,” Roberts asks. “I don’t think anyone gets it.”

–Morgan Ashenfelter

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x