Syria OK’s Arab League Deal

Syria OK’s Arab League Deal

 Obama wants Assad to quit, but the Arab League and Syria have agreed on a peace plan to resolve the crisis.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

UPDATE: Syria and the Arab League have annoubnced an agreement designed to end the crisis in Syria, and the deal has been endorsed by the United Nations. Now the question is: Will the Syrian opposition talk to President Assad?

With rumblings on the right about the need for NATO to turn its sanguinary attention to Syria, it’s a good sign that Syria seems to have accepted an Arab League plan to resolve the crisis peacefully. As always, however, the devil is lurking in a thicket of details.

According to published reports, the Arab League put forward a plan “calling for the Syrian government to withdraw security forces from the streets, stop violence by pro-government forces against civilians, and begin talks with the Syrian opposition in Cairo.” So far, it isn’t clear if Syria has accepted the proposal in full, put forward a counterproposal, or is just feinting. Later today, in Cairo, the league is supposed to make an official announcement.

Among the sticking points: Syria isn’t happy about negotiating with the opposition outside the country—i.e., in Cairo—because that means the more militant opposition will be included. Left to its druthers, President Assad’s government would prefer to talk to the more docile opposition, especially the Damascus-based figures who’ve already expressed a willingness to talk about reforms. Others, including forces based in Turkey—and, apparently, increasingly backed by the Turkish government—are tilting toward armed insurrection.

Yesterday, I blogged about the possibility of a NATO intervention, including calls from the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and from Senator John McCain about the need for a tougher, more interventionist approach. In that piece, I cited a denial from Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO chief, who ruled out NATO intervention a la Libya. But now Rasmussen is qualifying his statement a little, opening a trap door by saying that what happened in Libya ought to be a warning to Assad: “I strongly condemn the crackdown on the civilian population in Syria. What has happened in Libya sends a clear signal. You cannot neglect the will of the people.”

Inside Syria itself, there’s still fighting going on, and the crackdown continues.

But Russia has commented favorably on the Arab League plan, and China seems to back it, too. Xinhua, the Chinese news agency, reports on some possible Syrian modifications to the Arab League plan:

It has been reported that Damascus has made some amendments to the plan and incorporated its own considerations into it, including mainly the need of a complete halt of media campaign launched against Syria coupled with strict measures to stop funding of alleged terrorists and weapon smuggling across its borders.

Syria has also agreed to conduct dialogue with the opposition and make quick and radical reforms. However, the contentious issue is still the location to hold the proposed dialogue, as Damascus is showing unwavering determination to convene it in Damascus in presence of international observers from China, Russia, Brazil and India.

Stay tuned.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x