The Breakdown: How Will Citizens United Shape Our Democracy?

The Breakdown: How Will Citizens United Shape Our Democracy?

The Breakdown: How Will Citizens United Shape Our Democracy?

Lawrence Lessig talks to Chris Hayes about what progressives can do to combat the destructive effects of corporate money in elections.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Lawrence Lessig joins Chris Hayes to explain what Democrats and progressives can do to combat the destructive effects of corporate money in elections unleashed by the Supreme Court ruling.

The Breakdown In this year’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision, the Supreme Court ruled that corporate expenditures for independent political broadcasts could not be limited under the First Amendment.  With pre-election political campaigning in overdrive, what implications will Citizens United have for our electoral process?  Will any of the pending bills on campaign finance reform curb the effects of the Citizens United result? And what is the Democratic Party doing to combat corporations pouring unlimited money into elections? Lawrence Lessig, the Director of Harvard’s Edmond J. Safra Foundation Center for Ethics and author of the Nation article “How to Get Our Democracy Back” joins DC editor Chris Hayes on this week’s edition of The Breakdown to explain what politicians and progressives can do to limit the damage from Citizens United this year and in 2012.

Related Links

Video of Lawrence Lessig speaking at MIT, September 30, 2010.
Democracy after Citizen’s United,” by Lessig, Boston Review.
More information about Lessig from the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University.

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x