Can we add Netanyahu’s war against Iran to Barbara Tuchman’s list of unwise and counterproductive policy decisions detailed in her book The March of Folly?

Just a little more than a week before the beginning of the latest war, I was one of three Israelis who participated in the public launch of an Iranian-Israeli joint dialogue forum under the title “We Are Not Our Regimes,” hosted by the Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue in Vienna. The Iranians were all republicans (not the MAGA variety, but supporters of an Iranian republic) who are opposed both to the Islamist Ayatollah regime and to the monarchists represented by Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last Shah of Iran. Since it is impossible under the current circumstances for Iranians who live in Iran to participate in such a joint initiative, the Iranians who participated all live in Europe or the United States, though they all have family and friends who they are in contact with in Iran itself. The Israelis are all opposed to our current extremist, messianic government, led by Prime Minister Netanyahu.

Although both the Iranians and the Israelis would like to see regime change in Iran, they all agreed that a war initiated by external forces was not and could not be the way to achieve that goal (and regime change in both Israel and the United States would also be very welcomed by them). The Iranians emphasized that a desired regime change could only come from an internal struggle by the Iranian people. They listed two possibilities for such a development. One was the fact that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei was almost 87, and not in good health. It was possible that his successor would be more pragmatic and flexible, creating an opening for a more liberal regime in Iran. The second possibility was a renewed nuclear deal with the US, which would lead to a reduction of sanctions—a key to the development of a potent middle class in Iran that would be the driving force behind a successful popular demand for change in the regime.

Instead, what we got was a renewed war against Iran, this time a joint Israeli-American initiative. Netanyahu apparently convinced Trump that such an attack would galvanize the Iranian people to rise up and demand regime change. As Trump said after the war started, “Now is the time to seize control of your destiny.… America is backing you.… Be brave, be bold.… take back your country. America is with you.”

Well, it hasn’t quite happened that way. Instead, after Ayatollah Khamenei was assassinated by the Israelis, his son Mojtaba Khamenei was chosen to be his successor—the candidate of the extremist Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, who have clamped down on any potential popular protest. His father didn’t even designate him as one of his three potential successors! One of the designated potential successors was former Iranian president Hassan Rouhani, the reformist who negotiated the effective JCPOA (Iranian nuclear deal) with President Obama and who, together with his foreign minister, Mohammad Zarif, made overtures to the West. They even made a hint toward the Jews and, by implication, Israel—a greeting on the Rosh Hashanah holiday. Such an appointment as the successor to Khamenei could have led to the realization of both the possibility of a more pragmatic and flexible supreme leader and a nuclear deal that would have led to sanctions relief and the strengthening of key middle-class elements in Iranian society.

And to make matters worse, Israel then assassinated Ali Larijani, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, who had actively opposed the appointment of Khamenei’s son as the successor.

Our joint forum, now officially called the Iranian-Israeli Peace Forum, issued the following statement after the war began:

The historical context of the present war is complex but highly relevant. The ideologically driven hostility of the Islamic Republic of Iran toward the United States (the “Great Satan”) and the State of Israel (the “Little Satan”) has long contributed to an atmosphere of confrontation and helped create the conditions that made this deadly conflict possible.

At the same time, this hostility has also served as a convenient pretext for successive Israeli governments led by Benjamin Netanyahu to sustain and escalate tensions. Such escalation aligns with the agenda of Israeli fundamentalist forces and coincides with the political imperatives of maintaining his current governing coalition.

As for the United States, President Donald Trump did not seek congressional approval before launching the war, did not exhaust the negotiations track, and has been unclear about the war’s objectives and what outcome would bring it to an end.

The threats and provocations of the Islamic Republic do not justify the launch of a large-scale war. It is a war of choice initiated by two leaders whose unfounded claims that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat to the United States and Israel were invoked to legitimize military action undertaken in violation of international law.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Donate

We therefore condemn this war unequivocally. Military escalation will bring nothing but death, destruction, and suffering to the peoples of Iran, Israel, and the wider region. War will deepen insecurity rather than eliminate it.

There is no doubt that Iran is governed by a repressive, semi-totalitarian regime, yet its overthrow cannot be imposed from outside. The struggle for peace, freedom, democracy, and human rights must ultimately be waged by the citizens of Iran themselves.

Recent history offers sobering lessons. Foreign military interventions have repeatedly failed to deliver liberation or democracy. Instead, they have too often produced devastation, social fragmentation, and the danger of state collapse.

For these reasons, we call for an immediate end to the military hostilities and a renewed commitment to diplomacy, international law, and peaceful political transformation.

Netanyahu clearly wanted this war to distract attention from Gaza, to delay his trial for fraud, bribery, and breach of trust that he is afraid will result in a conviction and jail sentence, and to boost his standing in the polls toward the Israeli elections that must be held by October 2026.

The Ma’ariv daily publishes a poll every Friday indicating what the results would be if elections were held that day. Ever since the Gaza war began on October 7, 2023, and even beforehand during the period of the mass protests against the government’s attempt to undermine the independence of the courts, the results have been that Netanyahu’s extremist government would lose to the right-center-left opposition. Therefore, I was very anxious to see the results of the first Friday poll after the war began the previous Saturday. The result was that Netanyahu’s coalition gained just one seat, from 50 to 51 out of 120 seats in the Knesset (parliament). The combined opposition of the Jewish and predominantly Palestinian-Israeli parties had 69 seats. By the following week, Netanyahu’s coalition had already lost that seat!

It is true that unlike the majority American public opposition to the war, the overwhelming majority of the Jewish Israelis support the war, though as it completes its fourth week, support for continuation of the war has declined from 81 percent to 68 percent. Even many liberal analysts are gung-ho for this “necessary war.” This is primarily because Netanyahu and his associates have convinced the Israeli public that Iran, with its nuclear program, ballistic missiles, and proxies like Hamas and Hezbollah, poses an existential threat to Israel. Statements by Iranian leaders such as Ayatollah Khomeini and President Ahmadinejad that “Israel must be wiped off the map” have reinforced this fear. As the son of a historian, Netanyahu is very concerned with his legacy. He does not want to be remembered as the leader who failed to prevent the murder of 1,200 Israelis by Hamas on October 7 but as the man who successfully dealt with the Iranian threat, an issue that has always been at the top of his agenda.