Less than two weeks ago, French literary critics were showering Thélyson Orélien with praise, celebrating his latest novel C’était ça ou mourir (“It was either that or die”), the story of a social studies teacher who flees gang violence in Haiti to seek refuge in Canada. Surging out of the gates with over 45,000 copies sold in the opening weeks after its August 19 release, Orélien’s novel positioned him as one of the stars of the fall books season—and a contender for the prestigious Prix Goncourt.

But the fairytale literary breakout started to come crashing down on September 21, when an obscure post from an anonymous X account claimed that Orélien’s novel was in fact written by artificial intelligence. With screenshots to boot from the AI-verification software Pangram, the X account “Balance ton Claude”—“Expose your Claude,” an AI-era riff on the social-media hashtag popularized by France’s #MeToo movement, Claude being Anthropic’s AI app—alleged that the Haitian-Canadian novelist had systematically used artificial intelligence for the composition of his novel. That kicked off a frenzy that first circulated among far-right-linked social-media accounts. Established media organizations soon started to pick up the story too, running their own tests using Pangram that corroborated the accusations.

Orélien has firmly denied all the allegations made against him. In a September 22 interview, the writer shot back against his accusers, with numerous figures in French literary life also rallying to his defense in the face of what appeared to many like a coordinated sting operation. “Since my recent arrival in France, I have been subjected to numerous racist attacks,” the author told Libération. “I am not sad but angry.”

The ideological lines hardened further when conservative Le Figaro columnist Samuel Fitoussi claimed participation in what he called a “collective project” behind the “Balance ton Claude” account. The accusation against Orélien comes as a double strike for conservative literary circles, with the far-right weekly Valeurs actuelles condemning the “blindness of the literary establishment” and castigating Orélien as a “professional counterfeiter.” Their collective feeding frenzy has as one immediate effect the delegitimizing of a novel that offered something still in relatively short supply in French letters: the perspective of a Black francophone novelist writing on the experience of immigration and identity across the Global South and North.

To some observers, there’s a rich irony to using AI software to identify the use of AI itself. And while most specialists agree that AI detectors cannot provide definitive proof of fraud, the creators of Pangram have stood by their technology amid the scandal, touting its low false-positive rate. Making matters worse for the writer, Canadian journalists from La Presse and Radio Canada are now reporting that several articles in addition to an earlier fiction work by Orélien contain plagiarized passages.

With the curtain falling, Orélien was dropped from the Prix Goncourt long list on September 25. He has also since left France, returning to Canada midway through the C’était ça ou mourir promotional tour. Commentators have already drawn the connection between Orélien’s downfall and this summer’s scandal surrounding Jason Arday—the Cambridge University academic pushed to suicide after a series of exposed frauds landed him in the center of a media storm.

In France, doubt has a genealogy, especially when it falls on Black authors. In 1968, Yambo Ouologuem became the first Black African writer to win the Prix Renaudot, for Le devoir de violence (The Duty of Violence), before he too faced a smear campaign accusing him of plagiarism. The novel, as the Nouvel Obs journalist Doan Bui said on the show C ce soir, offered a textbook case of intertextuality—a popular style at the time involving the collaging of written sources. But that didn’t play in Ouologuem’s favor, even if the novel had already sold 80,000 copies and foreign rights to 10 countries. Ouologuem’s French publisher, Seuil, ceased reprinting the book. The Malian writer, then in his late 20s, never regained his place in francophone literature. In its nearly 125-year existence, the annual Prix Goncourt has been awarded to only four Black authors.

Suspicion is now spreading to other writers. Popular novelist Virginie Grimaldi has also been flagged by users running her work through Pangram. “It seems to me that we have dark days ahead of us, a climate of permanent suspicion. Today it was [Orélien], tomorrow it will be others,” Grimaldi wrote in a September 23 social-media post. “This morning, the next to fall is me.”

Whichever way you look at it, the Thélyson Orélien affair is a harbinger of things to come in the world of books, both inside and outside of France. A revolutionary new technology with undeniable and, many fear, devastating implications is overturning not a few of the sacred cows that seemed to embody literature’s cultural authority. It was probably only a matter of time before some AI-related scandal shattered once-robust assumptions surrounding authorship and the sanctity of literary creation.

But with opinion pages and talk-show panels giving open season to fears of an existential crisis in the literary world, it’s worth recalling that this is not the first such panic of 2026. Just a few months ago, however, the fears were of an entirely different nature. They centered around the rise of hard-right media mogul Vincent Bolloré, who since 2023 has gained control over Hachette, France’s largest publishing group and a multinational competitor to heavyweights like Penguin Random House and HarperCollins.