The climate activists are putting pressure on Dutch officials to reduce emissions at Europe’s most polluting port.
An Extinction Rebellion activist participates in an action to block traffic to the Port of Rotterdamn.(Anna Hiatt)
Rotterdam, Holland—Ali and Brockolie, two Extinction Rebellion activists in their early 20s, giggled and stuck out their hands. They showed me their fingers with gold glitter to obscure their prints in case of arrest. “Ali” and “Brockolie” aren’t their legal names. Like many other XR “rebels,” they use code names, which they change regularly. They kept the mood light, exchanging quips on this cold, gray day. “People can easily cramp up from the stress at the beginning of the action,” said Ali. “The experienced rebels, we make jokes.” That morning, more than 100 XR activists had already blocked access roads to the Port of Rotterdam in an attempt to force more aggressive climate action—but it wasn’t yet clear how the rest of the day would unfold.
Earlier this year, XR Rotterdam, a chapter of the decentralized climate movement Extinction Rebellion, made a strategic decision: Focus on Europe’s largest and most polluting port and demand that leaders ramp up decarbonization plans that XR says do not adequately respond to the accelerating climate crisis. For years, the mayor of Rotterdam, Ahmed Aboutaleb, has committed to decarbonizing both the city and the port, in which the city holds a majority stake. But climate activists say the city hasn’t done nearly enough.
Carbon accounting is notoriously difficult, but estimates say the Port of Rotterdam contributed about 16 percent to the Netherlands’ overall carbon dioxide emissions in 2020. This counts only CO2 emissions—not other greenhouse gases like methane—and only emissions that are directly attributable to the port, not, for example, shipping to and from the port or the fossil fuel use the port facilitates. As a significant contributor to the Netherlands’ total emissions, and climate activists see the Port of Rotterdam as an opportunity for high-impact protests.
XR Rotterdam’s Reclaim the Harbor campaign launched on World Harbor Day in September 2023 with four demands: Increase actions to decarbonize the port, provide green jobs to ensure a just transition for port workers, cut pollution and take responsibility for its harms, and work with the people of Rotterdam to make decisions about the port’s future. The activists made national news when they strung a banner across Rotterdam’s Erasmus Bridge reading “Herover de haven”—“Reclaim the harbor.”
As world leaders headed to Dubai for December’s COP28 climate summit, XR Rotterdam made plans to block transport traffic to the port which receives, processes, and transports fossil fuels (including coal, oil, and liquified natural gas) that power northwestern Europe.
On the day of the action, XR Rotterdam broadcast logistics via Telegram, and in the morning, I met up with one of the groups at the city’s main train station, Rotterdam Centraal. Forty or so people were there—all adults but whose ages spanned generations. Everyone kept a low profile; there were no visible flags or XR logos. About half a dozen or so uniformed police officers patrolled the periphery of the group. One officer wearing a body camera slowly walked circles around us, turning his body toward us, making sure to capture our faces on video.
A short bus ride later, we arrived at the first site, a three-way intersection on a road that runs along the length of the more than 40-square-mile port. The activists quickly spread into the intersection, unfurling banners and blocking passage. Columns of trucks backed up in all directions. Occasionally, the activists chanted and sang in English: “Solid like a rock / rooted like a tree / we are here / standing strong / in our rightful place.” And: “The oceans are rising / and so are we.”
People chatted—some nervously, some excitedly—about the possibility of getting arrested. Floris de Ruiter, a 21-year-old activist who started protesting in early 2023 after his dad challenged him to stop complaining and act instead, told me he was losing count of the times he’d been detained—14 or 15. He cut his teeth on this year’s A12 protests in The Hague, in which protesters blockaded the A12 motorway every day for weeks and demanded that the Dutch government stop subsidizing fossil fuels. Police used water cannons to disperse the protesters. There were daily mass arrests.
“Whenever we as civilians try to take matters into our own hands, we’re put away as criminals, or terrorists,” Ruiter said as we walked between the blocked intersections at the Port of Rotterdam. But, “the hope is still there, because otherwise, I wouldn’t be doing this.” Staying focused is hard, he said, but “we have to be strategically wise with our energy.”
Just then, we heard a trucker laying on his horn. I turned, expecting a hostile gesture, but the driver waved, gave the activists an enthusiastic thumbs up, and kept honking as he drove away. Ruiter whooped.
Throughout the day, the police officers hovered, occasionally trying to eavesdrop on protesters’ conversations. They also kept away from the protest a handful of port workers in their automobiles, some of whom hurled insults at the activists, and they put up traffic cones to direct traffic and intervened when a port worker in a car looked ready to plow through the group barring his exit.
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
The police also closely surveilled the protesters. A van equipped with half a dozen or more cameras parked close to the group. An XR activist spotted a monitor mounted on the passenger dashboard, broadcasting the footage the police were collecting—including video of the two of us. She photographed herself on the police monitor.
At the end of the day, the activists circled up. People bounced to stay warm; a group that had been sitting on the ground for hours barely moved and seemed immune to the cold. They’d stopped port traffic, but there’d been no arrests, and two people chained to each other seemed disappointed. An organizer reported good news: Mayor Aboutaleb wanted to talk. The group cheered.
On December 20, Aboutaleb sat down with XR Rotterdam. The activists criticized Aboutaleb for not using the city’s power as a majority shareholder in the port to force change. He acknowledged that the port’s energy transition has been too slow, promised to share activists’ concerns with the port authority, and asked for a follow-up meeting.
“Aboutaleb indicated that change does not happen without action and that we have to keep putting pressure on politicians,” said XR Rotterdam activist Daan van Meurs. “So we are on the right track, and we will continue to fight side by side with port workers and Rotterdammers to recapture our port.”
Anna HiattAnna Hiatt is the executive editor of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration co-founded by The Nation and Columbia Journalism Review. She’s a contributing editor for The Nation, where she was the executive digital editor.