Hacking Democracy
Kudos to Ari Berman for “American Democracy Besieged” [July 31/Aug. 7]. His article clearly and concisely demonstrates not just the foreign electoral interference from Russia (which dominates the headlines) but also the ongoing and equally troubling domestic voter-suppression efforts by the GOP. The red/blue-state resistance to Trump’s commission on “election integrity” is a start, but we need to begin entertaining real solutions that may help correct a dysfunctional system.
John Nichols’s “How to Revive Democracy,” in the same issue, recommends the Fair Representation Act inspired by FairVote’s Rob Richie and embraced by Representative Don Beyer as a possibility. These two articles should be reprinted side by side whenever The Nation decides to put out a compendium of the most powerful recent articles.
Sal R. Pauciello irvington, n.j.
Re “American Democracy Besieged”: Voter suppression almost certainly had more influence on the outcome of the 2016 election than did Russian hacking. President John F. Kennedy once said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” Politicians who actively prevent Americans from voting against them would be well advised to remember Kennedy’s words. Robert Baillie state college, pa.
Make America Democratic
John Nichols’s editorial “How to Revive Democracy” is a real boon to democracy. Representative Don Beyer’s bill, HR 3057, titled the Fair Representation Act, was introduced on June 26 and has been co-sponsored by Maryland’s Jaime Raskin, California’s Ro Khanna, and Tennessee’s Jim Cooper. This is a good start to a new awakening.
The bill puts an end to the major effects of gerrymandering while also creating more civility in election campaigns. Negative campaigning will become a detriment instead of a successful strategy as political candidates seek support from the second and third choices on voters’ ballots. And progressives will be able to cast their votes for the person they want without worrying about a spoiler effect.
This bill combines instant-runoff voting with proportional representation. More choices, more voters, more democracy will make America great again!
Melvin Mackey vashon, wash.
I read John Nichols’s editorial with interest, but I’m not sure I accept his premises. If House seats were combined into multimember districts, the same gerrymandering that goes on now would still occur, just on a larger scale. Also, I live in a community that uses ranked-choice voting, and it is no panacea. In our last mayoral election, one of the least progressive candidates came out on top, despite the fact that she would not have made it to a runoff under the old system. Dan Littman oakland, calif.
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
The ideas put forth in Congressman Don Beyer’s plan are interesting, and I think there are a few facts to bolster the argument against “gerry-mandered district lines rather than the will of the people.”
In the 2012 election for Congress, the Democrats received 1.4 million more votes than the Republicans, but the Republicans won the House with 231 seats to the Democrats’ 201. Moreover, in recent election cycles, the Republicans always received a higher percentage of seats than the percentage of votes received. For example, in 2016 they won 49.1 percent of the vote but 55.4 percent of the seats. And although the Democrats received 1.1 percent fewer votes, the result awarded them nearly 11 percent fewer seats: 241 to 194.
I guess the simple solution would be for the Democratic Party elites to decide to represent the people and thereby begin to win elections. Nonetheless, we also need good ideas like the Fair Representation Act.
Victor Sciamarelli
Dems: Remember the Base
Reading Katha Pollitt’s article “Running From Choice” [July 31/Aug. 7] reminded me of a campaign event I attended as president of the New Hampshire National Organization for Women. I held up NOW rounds, staffed an info table, and listened to the Democratic candidate preach why he was a better “choice” than the Republican candidate—both males. I interrupted him to point out that his opponent was pro-choice and he was anti-choice. The chair of the Hampton Democratic Committee screamed in my face that I was ruining her event. Later, two women softly told me they were glad I spoke up. How sad that speaking truth to power about reproductive rights is still unappreciated. Only women bleed. Barbara Dennett newfield, n.h.
Katha Pollitt’s articles on Democrats and abortion come as another bitter pill for women to swallow. We have supposed pro-choice men running the Democratic Party and, as a woman living in Ohio, I have witnessed the closing of multiple abortion clinics in our state and nationwide. This issue was never addressed by Bernie Sanders in his ego-driven rush to discredit Debbie Wasserman—Schultz and Hillary Clinton and what Hillary’s presidency would have meant for equality. I will never forgive The Nation, Senator Sanders, and his supporters for their treatment of Hillary and for Donald Trump’s victory. Sally J. Keller toledo, ohio
Action and Words
Thank you, Sasha Abramsky, for creating in your piece, “Caravan Against Fear” [July 31/Aug. 7], part of what you are calling for: the alternative stories that give people a sense that reality is bigger than the odd spectacle, that reality is something we can join in on. Mostly, thank you for telling the stories of people who have chosen to act. Christopher Theodore
Get unlimited access: $9.50 for six months.
In Defense of Prog Rock
Prog rock produced some of the most innovative, exciting, and beautiful music ever written [“Cruising to the Edge,” by David Hajdu, July 31/Aug. 7]. As in any art form, some of the musical visions from prog rock’s heyday were better realized than others. I saw all of the bands mentioned in the review numerous times in their prime years. My tastes in music have changed somewhat as I’ve aged, but I’ve always thought that the derision and terms like “grandiose” and “pretentious” came from critics who didn’t like or understand the music and from rockers who couldn’t play it. Too bad that these perspectives are still rolled out whenever prog rock is discussed today. Kudos to Hajdu for reviewing David Weigel’s The Show That Never Ends. Philip M. Prince
Our ReadersOur readers often submit letters to the editor that are worth publishing, in print and/or online.