Letters From the June 5-12, 2017, Issue

Letters From the June 5-12, 2017, Issue

Letters From the June 5-12, 2017, Issue

A history of colonization… Democracy or disintegration?… Borne back ceaselessly…

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

A History of Colonization


As someone who has a tendency to romanticize the Obama administration, particularly given our current leaky ship of state, it’s important for me to remember that the recent events written about by Chris Hayes [“Policing the Colony: From the Revolution to Ferguson,” April 17] occurred on Barack Obama’s watch. The rise of Trump and his ways of handling dissent (which we’ll surely see more of in the future) did not come out of a vacuum. This is in our nation’s DNA, alas.
Diane Smith

Democracy or Disintegration?


Thanks to Cécile Alduy, whose “Fringe No More” [April 24/ May 1] is a valuable account of French working-class bitterness, its roots, and its place in the current European situation.

The far right is one option for Europe, but another place to turn is the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25). Co-founded by Srecko Horvat, the Croatian philosopher and activist, and Yanis Varoufakis, the former Syriza finance minister, DiEM25 has an unflinching message for the times: The European Union will democratize, or it will disintegrate.

DiEM25’s proposals for democratizing the EU are innovative yet practical. It offers a sane, humane, and sophisticated response to the disruption of human institutions by the global capitalist system. Varoufakis makes his case eloquently, solidly, with humor and principled compassion. He speaks with visceral knowledge from negotiating the Greek debt with the EU. Noam Chomsky calls his work “brilliant.” Yet the organization seems absent from The Nation’s pages.

Democratic activists need publicity for the world to know that they are out there. By the nature of democratic action, most activists seem to emerge from nowhere. Lech Walesa, Nelson Mandela, the SNCC—how would they have fared without publicity?

Varoufakis was newsworthy while wrestling with the EU for the dignity of his countrymen. Why ignore the organization he is now building to continue facing down economic authoritarianism in Europe? If I am mistaken, and the people in DiEM25 are poseurs or rank amateurs, it seems The Nation should expose them.

At an issue a week, I may have missed a story somewhere—but as we learned with Bernie Sanders’s candidacy, for the media to ignore progressives is the same thing as opposing them.

Doris McCabe
bedford, va.

Borne Back Ceaselessly


I am just now getting around to reading the collection of writings in The Nation’s 150th-anniversary special issue. In the sidebar on page 26, I read that on March 5, 1877, Rutherford B. Hayes was inaugurated president despite losing the popular vote. At the time, The Nation proposed abolishing the Electoral College, “whose members ‘serve no useful purpose’ except to create ‘much sin and sorrow.’ ” A great many years later, we are still stuck in the same rut. How and when will we abolish the Electoral College so that our president is elected by the will of “the people”?
Cornelia Smollin
pittsburgh, penn.

Mon Dieu!


Eagle-eyed readers might have noticed something unusual about the French tricolor on the cover of the April 24/May 1 issue: The colors are reversed. The order, of course, should be bleu, blanc, rouge.

Disobey authoritarians, support The Nation

Over the past year you’ve read Nation writers like Elie Mystal, Kaveh Akbar, John Nichols, Joan Walsh, Bryce Covert, Dave Zirin, Jeet Heer, Michael T. Klare, Katha Pollitt, Amy Littlefield, Gregg Gonsalves, and Sasha Abramsky take on the Trump family’s corruption, set the record straight about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s catastrophic Make America Healthy Again movement, survey the fallout and human cost of the DOGE wrecking ball, anticipate the Supreme Court’s dangerous antidemocratic rulings, and amplify successful tactics of resistance on the streets and in Congress.

We publish these stories because when members of our communities are being abducted, household debt is climbing, and AI data centers are causing water and electricity shortages, we have a duty as journalists to do all we can to inform the public.

In 2026, our aim is to do more than ever before—but we need your support to make that happen. 

Through December 31, a generous donor will match all donations up to $75,000. That means that your contribution will be doubled, dollar for dollar. If we hit the full match, we’ll be starting 2026 with $150,000 to invest in the stories that impact real people’s lives—the kinds of stories that billionaire-owned, corporate-backed outlets aren’t covering. 

With your support, our team will publish major stories that the president and his allies won’t want you to read. We’ll cover the emerging military-tech industrial complex and matters of war, peace, and surveillance, as well as the affordability crisis, hunger, housing, healthcare, the environment, attacks on reproductive rights, and much more. At the same time, we’ll imagine alternatives to Trumpian rule and uplift efforts to create a better world, here and now. 

While your gift has twice the impact, I’m asking you to support The Nation with a donation today. You’ll empower the journalists, editors, and fact-checkers best equipped to hold this authoritarian administration to account. 

I hope you won’t miss this moment—donate to The Nation today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel 

Editor and publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x