Cruel and Inhuman
The force-feeding of prisoners on hunger strike, so powerfully described by Aviva Stahl in “Gag Order” [June 17/24], would not be possible without the active complicity of medical professionals. Whether or not the practice is held to be constitutional by the courts, state licensing boards generally do have the authority to act decisively against such providers.
As important, certifying bodies like the American Board of Internal Medicine have the power to suspend participating physicians from their rolls, hospitals are within their rights to deny them privileges, and insurance providers can refuse them malpractice coverage. Inserting a nasogastric tube over the objections of a competent patient is a clear violation of the basic ethical norms we teach our medical students. If physicians and physicians’ assistants faced significant disciplinary consequences for engaging in a practice that medical professionals widely view as a ghastly form of torture, prison authorities might soon find themselves without the personnel to carry it out.
Jacob M. Appel, md, jd, mph Director, Ethics Education in Psychiatry Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai new york city
Stahl’s article on the practice of force-feeding prisoners and depriving them of basic human contact for decades reveals an astonishing degree of inhumanity. Also disturbing but not discussed is the effect of such treatment on prison personnel. How can they take pride in their employment? And how can our government justify the expense of such useless, punitive activity? Our prison policies urgently need revision. Martin Terplan sausalito, calif.
Re “Gag Order”: The US government criticizes many other countries for their human-rights abuses. Precisely how different are the abuses described here from the ones we are criticizing? Jeffrey Harrison
I am a liberal. Then I read your article “Gag Order” and found that I think anyone who planned and executed a plan to take down the World Trade Center deserves anything that we can throw at him. Did the author of the article forget why this person is in prison in the first place? Rights? He forfeited his rights to be treated as a human being when he tried to kill us.
Some of your radical positions make it difficult to stay “liberal” by your extreme standards.
Irv Engel lake forest, calif.
A Worthy Education Plan
Re “Save Our Schools” by Nikhil Goyal [June 17/24]: I’ve been following public education as a layperson and an educator for 40 years. The charter-school idea was disastrous. (I live in Minnesota.) All the scholarship I’ve read puts the charter-school movement to shame. I can’t find how taking money from public education and giving it to corporate or private-education outfits will lift education for all. Bernie Sanders has a much better plan; there aren’t many like him. Julie Stroeve
Between the reemergence of right-wing red-baiting and Donald Trump’s use of the chilling National Security Presidential Memorandum–7 to criminalize left political organizing, we’re seeing McCarthyism reborn before our eyes.
This assault on democracy cannot be ignored or wished away. Resisting it requires bravery in the face of threats and repression, a steadfast commitment to the truth, and the unwavering belief that we can—and will—overcome this darkness.
We must have an independent media that sets the record straight, unearths corruption and abuses of power, and advances a politics of justice and dignity for all if we’re to win this fight.
That’s why I’m writing to you today. This September, The Nation needs to add 100 monthly donors to sustain our progressive journalism. Your contribution makes the next investigative report, the next truth-speaking column, and the next pathbreaking essay all possible.
I hope you’ll support our work with a recurring donation today. If you donate $10 or more a month, we’ll send you a brand new “Hands Off the Free Press!” sticker to recognise your commitment to our cause. Please, donate today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation
Correction
“Save Our Schools” by Nikhil Goyal [June 17/24] mistakenly states that 35 to 40 percent of charter schools are run by for-profit education-management organizations (EMOs). While 35 to 40 percent of charter schools are run by EMOs, only about half of those are for-profit.
Our ReadersOur readers often submit letters to the editor that are worth publishing, in print and/or online.