Bluesky

Donald Trump loves to trumpet imaginary victories and exalt in unreal achievements. In a previous column I described this as “a severe case of premature proclamation.” It’s related to another condition that besets the president: projectile dysfunction, which involves an excessive reliance on the ability of missiles to achieve political and diplomatic goals. 

In truth, the use of air power to drop bombs from great distances, although able to inflict horrific damage, rarely secures control of territory. This is a bitter truth the United States has been taught repeatedly in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Iran. Trump has repeatedly boasted that US air power has “obliterated” the Iranian military. The resumption of heavy fighting in the Middle East, with Iran inflicting damage on the US and its allies, has given lie to Trump’s braggadocio. 

Claiming that the US had achieved its military goal, Trump signed a memorandum of understanding with Iran on June 17. But the deal quickly unravelled because it was based not on a shared understanding but a shared misunderstanding: Trump fantasized that the deal vindicated his story about a great victory while the Iranians saw the agreement as consolidating the control of the Strait of Hormuz they won in the war. As Will Saletan summed up in The Bulwark,

Six weeks ago, to rationalize pulling out of the war, [Trump] committed himself to a story. The story was that Iran had capitulated, peace was at hand, and the world’s oil supply would soon be back online. He’s going to cling to that story, no matter how long the war goes on.

Current Issue

View our current issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Subscribe

But nobody ever accused Trump of learning from his mistakes. He is now engaging in yet another round of premature proclamation—this time regarding the startling nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia which he announced this week. 

The deal as initially described would allow Saudi Arabia to achieve its longstanding goal of having the US greenlight and assist in its civilian nuclear program without having to make any of the compromises that had previously prevented an agreement. The Wall Street Journal called it a “big win” for the Saudis, and Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute noted:

Compared to previous negotiations, Riyadh has secured remarkable concessions. It no longer appears to have to normalize relations with Israel as part of the package. It is reportedly not required to sign a traditional Section 123 agreement that would deprive [Saudi Arabia] of enrichment technology. And there are no comprehensive [International Atomic Energy Agency]  safeguards comparable to those Washington has long insisted upon elsewhere.

If these reports hold, Saudi Arabia has achieved what few thought Washington would ever accept.

But within 24 hours, the landmark deal was already starting to unravel. The New York Times reported the deal was “in doubt” because Trump had “added a new condition to the sale of nuclear reactors to the kingdom, declaring that the entire arrangement now depends on the Saudi willingness to establish diplomatic relations with Israel.”

This was a typical Trump negotiating tactic: pulling the rug out from someone after proclaiming a done deal. Journalist Laura Rozen reports that Saudi Arabia might not go along with Trump’s antics:

On Trump seemingly adding new conditions to the US Saudi nuclear deal, including Saudi Israel normalization, a Saudi source says: “It was signed. So nothing to renegotiate.” “Tweets don’t overturn signed agreements,” he added.

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Donate

I asked, did KSA agree to normalize with Israel at some point in the future in the deal or annexes. Saudi source said: “Nope.”

Leaving aside the issue of normalizing Saudi-Israeli relations, the deal is bad on its own terms. By foregoing IAEA safeguards and allowing Saudi Arabia access to enrichment technology, the Trump administration was undermining the logic of its war on Iran. This free pass to Saudi Arabia could also easily trigger nuclear proliferation. This was especially true since Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the effective ruler of Saudi Arabia, has openly stated since 2018 that the kingdom doesn’t rule out building nuclear weapons.

What’s more, Saudi Arabia is a brutal dictatorship with a long history of unstable behavior, ranging from the sponsorship of international terrorism to the assassination of critics of the regime such as Jamal Khashoggi. Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network was initially nurtured in the 1980s by the Saudi state. The extent of the Saudi government’s complicity in the 9/11 terrorist attack remains murky and the subject of investigation. To help the Saudi state get on the path to becoming a nuclear power is the height of madness. It is likely connected to the corrupt business deals the Trump family has made with the Saudi government. 

Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey notes that when Marco Rubio was in the Senate he “was among the loudest voices warning about the dangers of giving Saudi Arabia, which has openly vowed to develop nuclear weapons, access to nuclear technology.” Now as Secretary of State, Rubio is just as loud in trying to sell this deal.