Unless a resolution is found, the impact is likely to grow.
Satellite view of the Salalah oil storage fire after Iranian drone attack, on March 13, 2026. (Gallo Images / Orbital Horizon/Copernicus Sentinel Data 2026)
The war that Israel and the United States launched in the Persian Gulf has already led to what some analysts say is the largest disruption of energy supplies in decades. Unless a resolution is found, the impact is likely to grow. “We’re already in a very serious scenario, but there is still scope for it to get worse,” said Richard Bronze, head of geopolitics at Energy Aspects, a London-based market research firm.
While the United States and Israeli militaries have pulled off startling assassinations of Iranian leaders and smashed up a lot of weaponry, Iran has managed to score points of its own. “Iran has figured out where our pain point is,” said Sam Mundy, a retired US Marine lieutenant general, during a webinar held by the Middle East Institute, a Washington-based research group.
In what may have been in part an effort to soothe roiled markets, President Trump on Monday said in a social media message that the United States and Iran had held “very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution” of the conflict.
Brent crude had spiked to around $114 a barrel on Monday after President Trump’s weekend threats to strike Iran’s electric power plants unless Iran opened the Strait of Hormuz. Trump said Monday that he would postpone those attacks for five days to allow for negotiations.
Iranian officials denied that talks had taken place. On social media,, Mohammad B. Ghalibaf, Iran’s speaker of parliament, dismissed Trump’s account as an effort to “manipulate the financial and oil markets.”
The Strait, a narrow egress from the Persian Gulf, is the main pressure point mentioned by General Mundy. Threats to shipping backed up by actual attacks have reduced flows of tankers through the Strait, normally about 20 percent of global oil consumption, to a trickle of ships, mostly of Tehran’s choosing.
The removal of so much oil has sharply altered the mood in the market, turning expectations of a glut into fears of shortage. On Monday, Brent crude, the international benchmark, was trading at about $102 a barrel, up about 40 percent since the war began.
Other oil types and products like jet fuel are going for much higher prices, especially in Asia, the main destination of oil from the Gulf. Crude from Oman, which is outside the entrance to the Gulf, was selling for $185 a barrel on Monday “as refiners in Asia panic-bought to meet demand,” wrote Henning Gloystein, director for energy at Eurasia Group, a political risk firm.
Energy prices are surging for Americans as well. The average price of regular unleaded gasoline in the United States has risen by almost $1 to $3.93 a gallon compared to February, according to GasBuddy, a consumer website.
The high prices for oil and natural gas are already feeding into expectations of higher inflation, as shown by the rise in interest rates on government bond yields in countries like Britain and the United States.
The war seemed to be threatening to enter a dangerous new phase when Israel on March 18 struck processing facilities of Iran’s giant South Pars natural gas field, which supplies much of the country’s energy needs. Iran hit back by launching missiles at Ras Laffan, an area of the emirate of Qatar, hitting gas processing installations part-owned by energy giants Shell and Exxon Mobil. Saad Sherida Al-Kaabi, Qatar’s minister of state for energy, said in a statement on Friday that the damage would require three to five years to repair and would cost the country $20 billion a year.
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
Iran’s warning to the nearby Arab states like Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia that are closely allied with the United States is hard to miss. Not only will Iran try to target the oil and gas developments that have made these countries wealthy, but continued war risks blighting the futures they aspire to as financial and artificial intelligence hubs.
The war is not only damaging infrastructure and curbing exports but threatens to make these countries less attractive to the bankers and information technology professionals they likely need to fulfil their ambitions. The war could “damage the ability to attract the creative classes,” said Mehran Kanava, a professor of government at Georgetown University’s Doha, Qatar campus.
“These are states whose developmental ambitions by far outweigh their demographic realities,” he added.
Stanley ReedStanley Reed is a London-based writer on energy, business, and environment.