A McCain-Feingold Split: Feingold Scores Former Ally

A McCain-Feingold Split: Feingold Scores Former Ally

A McCain-Feingold Split: Feingold Scores Former Ally

Mention bipartisan cooperation and no two names come more quickly to mind than “McCain” and “Feingold.” Ever since Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona and Democratic Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin began working together more than a decade ago to promote the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law and related clean government initiatives, they have had something of a mutual-admiration society.

In 2000, when he was running a very different campaign for the presidency, McCain told me he would seriously consider giving Feingold a job in the administration he hoped to construct.

This year, McCain still mentions Feingold — not usually in the context of discussions about his potential Cabinet. In fact, the Republican presidential nominee has even brought up his Democratic colleague in debates with Barack Obama, where McCain has sought to portray himself as a more politically flexible contender than his Democratic rival.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

Mention bipartisan cooperation and no two names come more quickly to mind than “McCain” and “Feingold.” Ever since Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona and Democratic Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconsin began working together more than a decade ago to promote the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform law and related clean government initiatives, they have had something of a mutual-admiration society.

In 2000, when he was running a very different campaign for the presidency, McCain told me he would seriously consider giving Feingold a job in the administration he hoped to construct.

This year, McCain still mentions Feingold — not usually in the context of discussions about his potential Cabinet. In fact, the Republican presidential nominee has even brought up his Democratic colleague in debates with Barack Obama, where McCain has sought to portray himself as a more politically flexible contender than his Democratic rival.

Feingold, for his part, has spoken well of McCain during the current presidential campaign — even as the Wisconsinite has noted their disagreements on issues of war and peace, trade policy and civil liberties.

But the increasingly crude nature of the McCain campaign’s attacks on Democratic nominee Barack Obama — and the racial and ethnic insensitivity that has been tolerated at too many rallies featuring McCain and Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin — finally proved too much for Feingold this week.

On Monday, the other half of the McCain-Feingold duo called on McCain to knock it off.

Here’s what Russ Feingold said:

In a closely fought campaign like the Presidential race, elements of either side can get caught up in the emotions of the contest. This is especially true during stressful economic times. I heard Senator McCain help tamp down the rhetoric at a recent town hall meeting.

Regrettably, he needs to do more of that. An energetically waged campaign can all too easily slip over into something hateful and dangerous, and everyone from the candidate on down needs to do whatever it takes to stop that. It won’t seem credible for the John McCain I know to say his campaign should be respectful, while seeming to look the other way as his campaign employs certain tactics and rhetoric which apparently are intended to appeal to the fears of some Americans.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Ad Policy
x