Smoke shrouding the sun as it rises behind the skyline of lower Manhattan and One World Trade Center in New York City on June 7, 2023.(Gary Hershorn / Getty)
In September 2020, West Coast wildfires spread smoke that blackened the skies of the East Coast. I reported on the phenomenon for Inside Climate News, an exercise in detachment from the personal stakes of the issue as a New Yorker that allowed me to focus on the bigger picture. But less than three years later, such detachment feels impossible.
This story was produced for StudentNation, a program of the Nation Fund for Independent Journalism, which is dedicated to highlighting the best of student journalism. For more Student Nation, check out our archive or learn more about the program here. StudentNation is made possible through generous funding from The Puffin Foundation. If you’re a student and you have an article idea, please send pitches and questions to pitches@thenationfund.org.
Like many of my fellow New Yorkers, I spent last week obsessively checking the air quality index on my phone’s weather app and live updates from the New York Times as hazardous smoke from the Canadian wildfires blanketed skies across the Northeast. Photos of the burnt-orange sun overwhelmed social media platforms. Politicians were quick to express concern, but failed to connect the conversation to the global climate crisis.
The out-of-control Canadian wildfires are not incidental or anomalous: they are a manifestation of accelerating anthropogenic climate change. The crisis has led to consistently record-breaking and drought-producing heat that makes such wildfires much more likely than in the past. With that reality in mind, the current moment offers a number of key takeaways that we should not forget even after the haze has lifted.
As then–UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon stated in 2015, “Climate change carries no passport and knows no national borders.” For anyone who previously doubted the global nature of the climate crisis, the spread of Canadian wildfire smoke makes it glaringly obvious that the climate crisis will not be contained to single countries.
The smoke was only one manifestation of the growing cross-border impacts of the climate crisis, including forced displacement and consequent migration, which will affect up to more than a billion people within the next few decades.
Climate solutions, therefore, must cross borders, too. Wealthy, developed, and historically polluting countries like the United States must not only increase climate action within their own borders but also support and finance climate mitigation and adaptation in developing and low-emitting countries. Climate change is a public health crisis
Canadian wildfire smoke was far more than just an eyesore on a New York City or Philadelphia skyline. Climate change jeopardizes the most basic tenets of public health. While the levels of air quality in the US Northeast are dangerous for everyone, they pose a particularly high risk for people with preexisting respiratory, heart, and other immune system and health conditions.
The World Health Organization calls climate change “the biggest health threat facing humanity.” Climate change makes extreme heat, drought, and flooding more frequent, all of which can cause injury and even death; harms people directly through intensified disasters; and drives the spread of infectious diseases, increasing the chance of global health crises like the Covid-19 pandemic.
Health is a fundamental human right. In the last few years, dozens of human rights-based climate cases have been litigated in courtrooms across the globe. Climate change affects everyone, but not equally
For many Americans outside of the West Coast, experiencing the effects of hazardously poor air quality this past week was a relatively new experience. For a day, New York City overtook New Delhi as the world’s most polluted city.
Yet, for people in New Delhi and many South Asian cities, hazy skies and harmful air are a daily reality. Fossil fuel pollution is a major contributor to such air quality, causing one in every five deaths worldwide.
With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.
As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.
We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.
It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.
Onward,
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation
US climate action must support a renewable energy transition that benefits communities most affected by fossil fuel pollution globally. It’s also essential to recognize that such stark disparities in impact from the fossil fuel economy—products of environmental racism and climate injustice—also exist domestically, as historically marginalized communities suffer disproportionate exposure to air pollution. Unhoused people, too, are uniquely vulnerable to such pollution. The time for action is now
Research from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communications shows that an increasing percentage of Americans believe the science of and are concerned about the effects of anthropogenic climate change. Yet these attitudes must transform into action at every level of government.
Already, US climate action organizations are using the current moment as an opportunity to put pressure on state and national policy-makers. Environmental justice groups have called on politicians to enact stronger climate policies and hold the companies driving the climate crisis accountable. In New York, for example, advocates are pushing the state Assembly to pass several pieces of legislation that would decrease home pollution, make polluters pay, and bolster the implementation of state emission-reduction goals.
As Swedish teen climate activist Greta Thunberg famously said to world leaders in 2019, “Our house is on fire.” With that sentiment feeling just as literal as metaphorical for many North Americans last week, and with the Canadian wildfires still burning, it is clear that there is no time to delay. The time to act is now.
Ilana CohenIlana Cohen is a student at NYU Law, a freelance climate journalist, and a former leader of the Fossil Fuel Divest Harvard campaign. She is a cofounder of the Campus Climate Network organization, a 2022 Brower Youth Award winner, and originally from Brooklyn, New York.