“These companies are more profitable than the Big Three ever dreamed of being, and the workers are paid even less.”
Shawn Fain testifying before Congress on March 14, 2024.(Tierney L. Cross / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“Volkswagen family, welcome to the UAW family,” declared United Auto Workers union president Shawn Fain Friday night, after workers at the Volkswagen factory in Chattanooga, Tennessee, voted 2,628 to 985 for union representation. The overwhelming vote was a groundbreaking victory for the UAW at a foreign-owned plant in the historically hard-to-organize South.
In an interview conducted before the vote, Fain and I had an extended discussion about where the union is headed, including why winning at Volkswagen is crucial for organizing plants across the South and nationwide. We also discussed the broader struggle to organize non-union automakers in the US—such as Elon Musk’s Tesla plant in Fremont, California. This transcript has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
John Nichols: When the UAW strike against the Big Three succeeded, a lot of people were paying attention to what the union would do next. You signaled that the UAW was determined to organize the whole of the auto industry—to go after those Southern plants that are owned by foreign corporations, which has always been tough, and ultimately to take on Tesla.
Shawn Fain: People said we could never organize in the South. We hit 50 percent at Volkswagen [in early February] and then later in the month [reached 50 percent of workers] at Mercedes-Benz’s [Vance, Alabama, plant]. This goes back to something that’s not being talked about. Since [the Big Three victory] happened, since these workers have seen the difference a union makes, they want their share. These companies are more profitable than the Big Three ever dreamed of being, and the workers are paid even less. The exploitation of these workers is five times what it was in the Big Three. Workers are figuring that out now—they’re seeing the reality of that. And, already, because of this success, you’ve seen the state of Alabama, their Chamber of Commerce, their governor, coming out in opposition. They formed a new thing called “Alabama Strong,” where they’re trying to turn workers against the unions.
JN: There’s a long history of powerful political and economic interests in these Southern states seeking to block unions.
SF: You had Nikki Haley out there saying, as governor, “If you’re union, you’re not welcome in South Carolina.” They’re trying to pass [new anti-union] laws. They did it in Tennessee, they’re trying to do it in Georgia now, where if a company agrees to card-check authorization for unions, the company won’t get any funding from the state. They try to say that [getting workers to sign union cards] is the union strong-arming members. The union doesn’t strong-arm anybody into signing a union card. That’s a personal decision somebody makes. But what they don’t talk about is how the companies break the law every day with these employees. They hold captive-audience meetings. They threaten them. They threaten that they’re going to close their plant if they unionize. They threaten that they’ll send the jobs to Mexico. They break the law repeatedly and nothing happens.
JN: The companies create a circumstance where it’s often an act of courage to sign a union card. They have whole strategies to scare workers away from joining a union, yet they try to claim that the union is intimidating workers.
SF: That’s the arm-twisting. That’s the bullying that goes on. It comes from the company. The days when they put that [union bullying] narrative out there are going to be over. The bullying and the arm-twisting is a one-party thing—it’s on the side of the companies and the billionaire class. And that’s got to stop. We have to have laws in place that hold these companies accountable when they do break the damn law. When working-class people break the law, they go to jail. They have consequences. There aren’t consequences for these companies, and it’s got to stop.
JN: But you won’t get laws that stop it unless more supporters of unions are elected.
SF: That goes back, again, to the two candidates for president. Donald Trump was president, what did he do? He put an anti-union union buster as the head of the National Labor Relations Board, and we went backward. They killed the organizing drive at Volkswagen at that time.
With President Biden, labor’s going to have more favorable people in there. They’re going to work for working-class people. All these things come back to politics, and it comes back to the fact that working-class people need to look out for their interests. It all ties together.
I know that many important organizations are asking you to donate today, but this year especially, The Nation needs your support.
Over the course of 2025, the Trump administration has presided over a government designed to chill activism and dissent.
The Nation experienced its efforts to destroy press freedom firsthand in September, when Vice President JD Vance attacked our magazine. Vance was following Donald Trump’s lead—waging war on the media through a series of lawsuits against publications and broadcasters, all intended to intimidate those speaking truth to power.
The Nation will never yield to these menacing currents. We have survived for 160 years and we will continue challenging new forms of intimidation, just as we refused to bow to McCarthyism seven decades ago. But in this frightening media environment, we’re relying on you to help us fund journalism that effectively challenges Trump’s crude authoritarianism.
For today only, a generous donor is matching all gifts to The Nation up to $25,000. If we hit our goal this Giving Tuesday, that’s $50,000 for journalism with a sense of urgency.
With your support, we’ll continue to publish investigations that expose the administration’s corruption, analysis that sounds the alarm on AI’s unregulated capture of the military, and profiles of the inspiring stories of people who successfully take on the ICE terror machine.
We’ll also introduce you to the new faces and ideas in this progressive moment, just like we did with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. We will always believe that a more just tomorrow is in our power today.
Please, don’t miss this chance to double your impact. Donate to The Nation today.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
JN: There are a lot more people to organize in the South. Then there’s Elon Musk and Tesla. When the UAW takes on Tesla, it’s really taking on the billionaire class, right? As regards setting the narrative for America, that’s a big deal.
SF: Look, Tesla’s in the same place on the radar as everybody in the South is. It’s not favoring one over the other. We’re prioritizing where momentum is at the current time and we’re focusing there and we’re going to keep building it. I firmly believe once the first domino falls, you’re going to see the floodgates open. Because people are going to realize the benefit of being in a union.
Update, 4/20/24: This piece was updated to reflect the UAW’s victory at the Volkswagen plant.
John NicholsTwitterJohn Nichols is the executive editor of The Nation. He previously served as the magazine’s national affairs correspondent and Washington correspondent. Nichols has written, cowritten, or edited over a dozen books on topics ranging from histories of American socialism and the Democratic Party to analyses of US and global media systems. His latest, cowritten with Senator Bernie Sanders, is the New York Times bestseller It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism.