Beyond Family
I agree with Bryce Covert [“A Simple Plan,” Dec. 17/24] that something must be done about poverty. However, her column leaves out a group of people who are also excluded from the plans by Senators Kamala Harris and Cory Booker: poor, childless adults.
I am 67, single, with no children. I have had nothing but low-paying jobs all my life, in spite of having a college degree and being an Army veteran. Therefore, I have lived my adult life at or near the federal poverty level. I live in Northern California and can’t afford my own place. Please do not forget those of us who are poor, childless, and alone.
Roberta Benjamin santa rosa, calif.
Fox Lite
Re Nawal Arjini’s “Et Tu, Chuck?” [Dec. 17/24; print only]: I too have noticed that MSNBC has become something of an imitation of Fox News. Such neocon panelists as Bill Kristol, Alan Dershowitz, and Norman Podhoretz are now regulars on MSNBC. The women who lead the discussions do not show as much leg as they do on Fox, and they are all very smart, but one wonders if the primary job requirement is not to be “eye candy.” Darcy Rowe columbia, md.
One More Lesson
I have one gripe with D.D. Guttenplan’s otherwise fine “Nine Lessons From the 2018 Midterms” [Dec. 17/24], and it’s his reference to Mike Capuano as an “establishment Democrat.” Guttenplan didn’t actually name him, but he’s the guy that Ayanna Pressley beat in Somerville, Massachusetts, and parts of Boston.
I’ve seen Pressley’s victory over Capuano referred to in similar ways elsewhere, totally ignoring the fact that Capuano was and is a genuine progressive champion—one of the most gutsy and progressive members of Congress. It hurt to see him lose. I’m confident that Pressley will be another effective progressive player in American politics, and her victory was surely a win for women and people of color. But I worry that it was also a victory for ageism in a district with a huge proportion of young voters.
Capuano deserves some acknowledgment, not this kind of slap in the face. Guttenplan was not alone in administering it, but it really disturbs me to see it continue.
Rev. Dr. F. Jay Deacon springfield, mass.
Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets.
Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.
As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war.
In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth.
The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more.
But this journalism is possible only with your support.
This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?
No Nukes Are Good Nukes
My deepest thanks to The Nation for publishing Beatrice Fihn’s desperately needed article, “Women Against the Bomb” [Dec. 3/10]. The dangers of nuclear weapons are so great—and increasing—that our survival as a species depends on all the support we can get from the publication of such stories. Please continue to publish articles that help alert people to the tremendous peril to our planet from these insane weapons of utter destructiveness.
Rama Kumar fairfax, calif.
Laying Waste
Re Bill Hartung’s “The Cost of War” [Dec. 17/24]: We need to cut the Pentagon’s budget by at least half. None of the wars we are fighting have even the smallest concern with “national security.” They are sham wars, wasting the lives and loyalty of our troops, and even more so the lives and security of the people in the countries where we are engaged, who end up losing everything. Muhammad Thompson
Our ReadersOur readers often submit letters to the editor that are worth publishing, in print and/or online.