Most people where I come from know the opening narration to the television show Law and Order by heart: “In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police who investigate crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories. [Ding-ding].” But what happens when federal terrorists masquerading as law enforcement are the ones committing the crimes, and the district attorneys and judges are ignored by the federal government?

In Minneapolis–St. Paul, we are getting our answer: The people are taking matters into their own hands and representing themselves. “People v. ICE” would be the heading on a criminal charge brought against the American stormtroopers. The People versus ICE is what we’re seeing in the streets.

For the record, there have been actual lawsuits—lots of them—in response to the ICE operation known as “Operation Metro Surge.” State Attorney General Keith Ellison filed one to halt ICE’s occupation of the Twin Cities, and it received a hearing earlier this week. In a separate lawsuit, Chief District Court Judge Patrick J. Schiltz ordered the acting ICE director, Todd Lyons, to appear in his courtroom and answer for the unlawful arrests and detentions carried out by ICE, in violation of the right to due process. The ACLU and the International Refugee Assistance Program have filed class actions against ICE over its illegal deportations and kidnappings. And numerous individual Minnesotans have filed lawsuits over the illegal harassment and brutality they’ve faced at the hands of ICE.

These lawsuits are all worthy and necessary—if nothing else, they remind us of what our rights should be. But none of them have stopped or even restrained ICE. None of them have scared the Trump administration into putting down their copies of Mein Kampf long enough to read the Constitution. And none of them have turned public sentiment against ICE or motivated the Democrats to take hard stances against Trump’s unlawful occupation of Minneapolis.

What has mattered is the people. The people are leading—as we see when they show up to protest peacefully in freezing temperatures against the ongoing occupation of their state. The people are helping—as we see when they walk neighbors’ children to school so their parents don’t have to risk abduction at the hands of ICE. The people are dying—as we see when they try to offer support and comfort to their fellow protesters who have been brutalized by ICE. The people are doing what the law cannot: defending their rights and the rights of others. And, unlike the lawyers and judges and politicians, the people are willing to risk their lives doing it.

That has made all the difference. Trump is now backtracking (and backing up the bus over Homeland Security cosplayer Kristi Noem) in a way we’ve never seen before. Democrats, belatedly, are starting to get a clue, not because they’ve finally realized they’re on the correct moral and legal side of the issue, but because the people will accept nothing less. Trump is starting to look for a way out of Minnesota, not because of the strength of the opposition party or the numerous legal challenges to his government, but because the people have made it impossible to ignore their cause.

What’s happening in Minnesota is not some kind of weird inversion of the normal order of things. It’s not strange that the people are ahead of the law. This is usually how change happens: The law is a lagging indicator of social justice. The law is not now nor ever has been a leader in reversing fascism, authoritarianism, or atrocity. Movements start in the streets and later, often years later, the law tries to catch up and codify what movements have already made a reality. We celebrate legal and legislative victories—like Brown v. Board of Education or the Civil Rights Act—as bloodless acts of social change, but we forget that these victories are not possible without the toil and blood of people who take to the streets, willing to risk it all for progress and justice.

Should Trump lose any of the myriad lawsuits he faces in Minnesota—and should he actually follow court orders against him—it will be, at least in part, because of the people. Yes, the cases are strong. But we like to act like judges are immune from public pressure (the theory behind lifetime appointments is to inculcate judges from that pressure). They are not. Judges can see and respond to the way the wind is blowing, just like everybody else. When ordering acting director Lyons to appear in his courtroom, Judge Schultz acknowledged that his request was “extraordinary,” but also said that “the extent of ICE’s violation of court orders is likewise extraordinary”—adding, “The court’s patience is at an end.”

Would Judge Schultz have reached this unprecedented point without the desperate resistance of the people of Minneapolis? I doubt it. And while it is easy for me to predict that Trump will not make Lyons go to Minnesota and answer for ICE’s action, there’s more of a chance of that happening now than there would have been if all we had were a court order and another strongly worded letter from Democrats.

Don’t get me wrong: The cost to the people is high. People are dead. Children have been kidnapped. Lives and livelihoods have been destroyed. Victory has not been achieved. Yes, Trump is moving Greg Bovino out, but he’s moving Tom Homan in. (I saw a person on social media say replacing Bovino with Homan “is like shitting your pants and changing your shirt.”) Trump flinched in Minnesota, but when Stephen Miller wakes up tonight and crawls out of his casket, he will surely advise Trump to “double down” on evil. The Battle of Minneapolis is far from over.