A new report shows there is absolutely a winning constituency for economic and social progress. But Democrats aren’t pursuing it.
Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) speaks to a full auditorium as part of the “Fighting Oligarchy” tour on April 14, 2025, in Nampa, Idaho. According to event organizers, 12,500 people attended the rally.(Natalie Behring / Getty Images)
Nobody seems to feel good about the Democratic Party these days.
With its approval rating at historic lows, panic over the New York mayoral race, and elected officials uncertain about how to move forward, few are optimistic about the direction the Democrats are headed.
There is certainly reason for concern. Catalist, a leading electoral research firm, recently released its breakdown of the 2024 election, and the results do not bode well. The Democrats have made no progress reversing their steady loss of working-class support. Worse yet, this trend is finally catching up with non-white and young voters, who shifted substantially toward Donald Trump in November.
A new report from the Center for Working-Class Politics (CWCP) and Jacobin magazine sheds light on these trends and how they might be reversed. The survey examines over 60 years of polling data in order to comprehensively document the evolving opinions of working-class voters on a variety of political questions. With these findings, we can better understand what workers want and how that conflicts with the party’s more well-off constituencies.
The report finds that, while that schism can’t be ignored, there is absolutely a winning constituency for economic and social progress—but Democrats aren’t pursuing it.
What We Found
While working-class voters are not a monolith, the CWCP survey highlights a range of important commonalities across this group.
Above all, working-class voters are economically progressive. Seventy-five percent favor an increase in the minimum wage, 88 percent are for the government’s reducing prescription drug prices, and 65 percent agree that corporate boards of directors should be required to include workers. Interestingly, 63 percent of these voters also favor import limits to protect jobs in the US. This suggests that, if the GOP can only execute tariffs with careless disregard, then the Democrats may stand to gain from deploying them thoughtfully, perhaps to enforce common labor and environmental standards.
On cultural questions, working-class voters are onboard with the cornerstones of the progressive agenda, though not every item. Roughly 80 percent oppose outlawing abortion, support laws protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination, and wish to strengthen controls on gun purchases. That said, only about half consider themselves “pro-choice” or support an assault weapons ban. Finally, only around 10 percent of working-class voters wish to see the state or federal government spend less on law enforcement.
What about immigration? Though other work has shown that working-class voters (and indeed Americans overall) tend to trust Republicans more on this issue, the full story is more complicated. Roughly 70 percent are against family separations, and don’t believe immigrants will take American jobs. And 61 percent support a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, a rate that would surely be higher if not for backlash against Biden-era border policy. (Indeed, the backlash may now be going the other way.) The Democratic Party can find the audience for an empathetic immigration policy, but it will have to be willing to fight a serious messaging battle for it.
Of course, not all of these positions are shared by non-working-class voters, who now make up a sizable share of the Democratic electorate. The latter are more liberal on abortion and immigration, for example. On the other hand, working-class voters have significantly more egalitarian views on issues like industrial policy, Social Security, and Medicare. Given the sizable differences of opinion between the two groups, there may be a real trade-off for Democrats between winning working-class and non-working-class voters.
I know that many important organizations are asking you to donate today, but this year especially, The Nation needs your support.
Over the course of 2025, the Trump administration has presided over a government designed to chill activism and dissent.
The Nation experienced its efforts to destroy press freedom firsthand in September, when Vice President JD Vance attacked our magazine. Vance was following Donald Trump’s lead—waging war on the media through a series of lawsuits against publications and broadcasters, all intended to intimidate those speaking truth to power.
The Nation will never yield to these menacing currents. We have survived for 160 years and we will continue challenging new forms of intimidation, just as we refused to bow to McCarthyism seven decades ago. But in this frightening media environment, we’re relying on you to help us fund journalism that effectively challenges Trump’s crude authoritarianism.
For today only, a generous donor is matching all gifts to The Nation up to $25,000. If we hit our goal this Giving Tuesday, that’s $50,000 for journalism with a sense of urgency.
With your support, we’ll continue to publish investigations that expose the administration’s corruption, analysis that sounds the alarm on AI’s unregulated capture of the military, and profiles of the inspiring stories of people who successfully take on the ICE terror machine.
We’ll also introduce you to the new faces and ideas in this progressive moment, just like we did with New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. We will always believe that a more just tomorrow is in our power today.
Please, don’t miss this chance to double your impact. Donate to The Nation today.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editor and publisher, The Nation
Yet the report also suggests that such trade-offs are not the whole story. This is because a significant portion of the working class generally agrees with Democratic voters on the issues, but votes for Republicans. Specifically, of working-class voters who voted for Trump in 2020, a whopping 20 percent support a higher minimum wage, increased social welfare spending, increased public school spending, and a tax on millionaires. Of that group, roughly half hold moderate-to-liberal views on cultural issues.
Ten percent of Trump’s working-class voters may not seem like a huge constituency, but in a world where presidential elections are won by one or two percentage points, it is enough to tip the scales several times over. If Democrats can articulate credible support for that kind of platform, these findings suggest that a winning coalition will come together.
Where We Go From Here
Getting working-class voters excited about the Democratic Party once again is a tall order. But recent successes like Zohran Mamdani’s campaign, which attracted record youth turnout, and Bernie Sanders’s Fighting Oligarchy tour, which attracted massive crowds in Trump country, speak to a deep, untapped wellspring of energy. One crucial element these initiatives share is that they meet working Americans where they are, “ahead of public opinion but within arm’s reach,” as one Democratic politician put it.
Generating wider enthusiasm for a national Democratic campaign will take serious message discipline. But what this report shows is that the constituency for a progressive party is out there and waiting to be courted. The alternative is to court further destruction by Republican government.
Isaac RabbaniIsaac Rabbani is an economist and a researcher at the Center for Working-Class Politics.