Toggle Menu

NYC Students Meet at City Hall to Debate Guns

As millions around the world participated in the March for Our Lives, 35 children aged 8 to 10 took turns sharing their reasons for restricting gun use.

Brandon Jordan

March 26, 2018

New York City Hall(Photo courtesy of Momos at en.wikipedia, CC 3.0)

This article is reposted with permission from Kings County Politics.

This story was produced for Student Nation, a section devoted to highlighting campus activism and student movements from students in their own words. For more Student Nation, check out our archive. Are you a student with a campus activism story? Send questions and pitches to Samantha Schuyler at samantha@thenation.com. The Student Nation program is made possible through generous funding from The Puffin Foundation.

As millions around the world participated in last Saturday’s March for Our Lives rally, about 35 children aged 8 to 10 participated in a debate at City Hall on whether guns should be restricted.

The discussion was organized by the Brooklyn chapter of Jack and Jill of America, a mother-led organization that engages in community service. Michelle Cornegy, whose husband is City Council member Robert Cornegy Jr. (Bedford-Stuyvesant, Northern Crown Heights), highlighted how the organization offers resources for children of color. The councilmember made an appearance at the event to support recent anti–gun violence efforts.

“Our mission is to grow and to grow leaders,” she said.

Current Issue

View our current issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Last year, children debated whether circuses should keep using performing animals. The debate featured a special appearance from Mayor Bill de Blasio. This year’s topic was chosen because of the recent debate around guns.

After several kids volunteered for the side for which they would argue, they began to write their speeches—with their parents offering guidance—on large index cards for the discussion held that afternoon. A few parents offered their help, such as Kenya Johnson.

Johnson found the event format helpful in teaching kids issues at an early age, especially for her special-needs child, Jeremiah.

“It’s wonderful that children in America have gotten civically engaged, and we could only hope that it makes a difference,” she said.

Tracy Wright, another mother, noted that her son Kaden already had an idea for his position for why guns are harmful. She too found the debate format helpful as an educative tool for children to express their opinions.

“I hope this is the seed for kids to come to City Hall and talk about issues,” she said.

US Representative Yvette Clarke (D-Crown Heights, Flatbush, East Flatbush, Brownsville, Sheepshead Bay) stopped by to deliver some comments to the students before the short debate. She asked them questions on a variety of topics, including where the House of Representatives is located and how they might work for change in their schools.

Support independent journalism that does not fall in line

Even before February 28, the reasons for Donald Trump’s imploding approval rating were abundantly clear: untrammeled corruption and personal enrichment to the tune of billions of dollars during an affordability crisis, a foreign policy guided only by his own derelict sense of morality, and the deployment of a murderous campaign of occupation, detention, and deportation on American streets. 

Now an undeclared, unauthorized, unpopular, and unconstitutional war of aggression against Iran has spread like wildfire through the region and into Europe. A new “forever war”—with an ever-increasing likelihood of American troops on the ground—may very well be upon us.  

As we’ve seen over and over, this administration uses lies, misdirection, and attempts to flood the zone to justify its abuses of power at home and abroad. Just as Trump, Marco Rubio, and Pete Hegseth offer erratic and contradictory rationales for the attacks on Iran, the administration is also spreading the lie that the upcoming midterm elections are under threat from noncitizens on voter rolls. When these lies go unchecked, they become the basis for further authoritarian encroachment and war. 

In these dark times, independent journalism is uniquely able to uncover the falsehoods that threaten our republic—and civilians around the world—and shine a bright light on the truth. 

The Nation’s experienced team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers understands the scale of what we’re up against and the urgency with which we have to act. That’s why we’re publishing critical reporting and analysis of the war on Iran, ICE violence at home, new forms of voter suppression emerging in the courts, and much more. 

But this journalism is possible only with your support.

This March, The Nation needs to raise $50,000 to ensure that we have the resources for reporting and analysis that sets the record straight and empowers people of conscience to organize. Will you donate today?

Clarke understood how important it was to ensure passage of legislation in response to the shootings happening across the country. She noted that in 2003, while she was a City Council member, an individual fatally shot her Brooklyn colleague James Davis.

“This man was loved by everybody, and his life was taken by gun violence. So when I go to Washington, DC, I get upset as well,” Clarke said.

Cornegy also commended the children for their efforts not only in forming their arguments, but also in informing public leaders like himself on issues like gun control.

“What you do here today actually informs the way I perform, the way the congresswoman performs on your behalf,” he said.

Before the short debate, the ninth-district leader said there does exist a demand to pass laws in Congress. She acknowledged the resistance from Republican lawmakers on bringing any gun-related legislation to the floor. Yet she felt hopeful a change would happen soon.

“As we build, as all of these folks who believe like we do, we know in the end we’re going to prevail. We’re going to bring legislation that’s going to change lives,” Clarke said.

The kids then took turns to share their reasons on whether guns should be restricted. Some argued that they could be used for self-defense, while those against highlighted that they present a danger to the public.

They were unanimous and enthusiastic in supporting at least one issue—eating pizza after the debate.

Brandon JordanTwitterBrandon Jordan is a freelance journalist whose work has appeared in City Limits, Waging Nonviolence, In These Times, and more.


Latest from the nation