President Obama’s aides are predicting that a number of Republicans will vote to confirm the nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to fill the place on the U.S. Supreme Court that is being vacated by Justice John Paul Stevens.
That would be appropriate, as Kagan record is hardly that of a liberal firebrand.
Indeed, in her youth, she aligned herself with some of the most conservative thinkers in the country – a move that, with its usual determination to sacrifice even ideological correctness in favor of rank partisanship, the Republican National Committee is now attacking her for doing so.
On the eve of the opening of the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Kagan’s nomination, Obama senior advisor David Axelrod was arguing that “this should be an easy decision for the committee and the Senate.”
Even allowing for what the veteran political operative acknowledges is a “charged” and “extraordinarily political” atmosphere in the Capitol, Axelrod said: "I think that there will be many Republicans who will vote for this nominee…”
One reason for this, Axelrod suggests, is that Republicans who might want to embarrass the president in an election year by derailing one of his nomineeshave been unable to “sustain” a steady line of attack on Kagan. Describing the nominee’s detractors within the GOP camp as an “opposition in search of a rationale,” Axelrod said Kagan’s critics have been “jumping around” from one argument to another in hopes that something would cause the great mass of Americans – and perhaps even some Senate Democrats – to have second thoughts about her.
In fact, the “jumping around” might even strengthen the case for Kagan.
The Republican National Committee, in one of its packaged “research briefing” attacks on the nominee put out prior to the hearings, highlighted what the RNC described as: “KAGAN: THE EARLY YEARS” According to a headline on the report: “Elena Kagan’s College Writings Provide Early Window To Her Activist Liberal Philosophy.”
Another headline screamed: “AT PRINCETON, KAGAN EXPRESSED A STRONG LIBERAL PHILOSOPHY.”
Yikes, that’s scary.
So what was Kagan’s crime?
First off, the RNC’s researchers noted, after coming through the nominee’s record, that: “As Editorial Chairman Of The Daily Princetonian, Kagan Argued Against Draft Registration, Calling It "A Manifestation Of A Growing Militarism."