For the past several weeks, clusters of citizens have been protesting the opportunistically named “fiscal cliff” budget cut talks. Even though the “fiscal cliff” is really more of a fiscal curb or fiscal slope, conservative lawmakers have seized upon the media-generated panic surrounding the doomsday January 1 cutoff date as an excuse to inflict further cuts and steer the conversation away from ending tax breaks for the one percent.
The push back from citizens began when activists from ACT UP protested the possible inclusion of cuts to AIDS funding during the negotiations. Activists arranged a table and chairs outside Senator John Kerry’s home in Boston as part of a mock Thanksgiving meal during which they put pill bottles on plates instead of food, saying they want Kerry to fight to fully fund AIDS programs during the negotiations.
The following week, three AIDS activists from Vocal-NY were arrested after they stripped naked in the outer office of House Speaker John Boehner.
“We wanted to strip away the rhetoric of the fiscal cliff,” the director, Sean Barry, told The Washington Post, adding that the cuts could leave tens of thousands without the ability to treat their disease.
In Tennessee, protesters say they are preparing to gather in downtown Jackson in order to support the Obama administration’s request to put pressure on Republicans.
“He asked us to be behind him, the same message that got him elected. He needs supporters,” said resident Alma Jones to an ABC affiliate.
The federal budget fight also has a local component for Tennessee residents, who have been watching their own state government wage a budget battle in the Capitol. Residents have written hundreds of letters to Congress, demanding a bill that extends tax cuts for the middle class and raises taxes on households that make more than $250,000 a year.
Anne Nesse, a former Democrate candidate for Idaho’s Senate District 4, delivered a letter to Senator Mike Crapo’s office as part of a nationwide move pushed by MoveOn.org to oppose the GOP’s effort to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and cut Social Security (which does not contribute to the deficit), Medicare and Medicaid.
By a ratio of roughly 9 to 1: voters of all income levels here do not believe in “trickle down economics”. Voters here understand that unless the wealthy are actually creating jobs at which citizens can make a livable wage, that giving a tax cut to this group does NOT help our economy, or help to pay off our federal deficit that we owe primarily to ourselves in entitlements like medicare and social security.