Electoral Politics May be Messy, but It’s Better Than the Alternative

Electoral Politics May be Messy, but It’s Better Than the Alternative

Electoral Politics May be Messy, but It’s Better Than the Alternative

The European Union and American electoral politics are both examples of human conflict channeled through non-violent processes.

Copy Link
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Bluesky
Pocket
Email

On his show Saturday, Christopher Hayes defended process against the backdrop of the vice presidential debate, during which Martha Raddatz questioned the “negativity” of both tickets’ campaigns. The nastiness of electoral politics may put us off, Hayes says, but it’s how “we as human beings channel and resolve conflict in a non-violent fashion.” The European Union, which is taking flack for winning the Nobel Peace Prize, despite its ongoing crisis, represents the triumph of process in maintaining peace on a continent “that was the site of some of the most horrifying war, violence, brutality, sadism and genocide in the history of the planet.”

—Steven Hsieh

Support The Nation’s June Fundraising Campaign

With the midterm elections now firmly upon us, the question is whether Democratic candidates will do more than merely occupy ballot lines as mild alternatives to the red-hot crisis that is Donald Trump.

As Trump spends over $1 billion a day on a globally destabilizing war on Iran and admits that he doesn’t “think about Americans’ financial situation,” millions across the country are struggling with the surging costs of essentials. Democrats must seize this moment and advance bold, small-“d” populist ideas—not settle for cynical caution that once again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.

The Nation elevates progressive ideas, movements, and elected officials achieving real change across the country into the national conversation. At the same time, our journalists are exposing how crypto and AI-funded super PACs are spending hundreds of millions of dollars to knock out candidates they oppose, reporting on the devastating impact of the Supreme Court’s evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, and sounding the alarm on attempts by red states to quickly redraw electoral maps, disenfranchising Southern Black voters.

We can play this critical role because of support from readers like you. This June, we’re raising $20,000 to power The Nation’s independent journalism in the run-up to November’s immensely consequential elections.

It’s in our power to build a more just society, and your support at this critical moment brings us closer to that bold vision. I hope you’ll donate today.

Onward,

Katrina vanden Huevel
Editor and Publisher, The Nation

Ad Policy
x