McChrystal, Afghanistan Policy and…

McChrystal, Afghanistan Policy and…

Here we are again, if a general and a president are at odds—it must be a manhood-measuring contest.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

To heck with the war. It’s becoming a story about egos. Or more precisely, as one commentator put it recently, "By focusing on McChrystal’s supposed challenge to Obama’s manhood—the press is turning a story about policy into a story about penises."

Ever since Rolling Stone‘s story broke, the chattering—and twittering—class started to speculate about McChrystal’s firing. Was Obama going to prove his mettle by firing the loose-lipped general? Or would this be another failure of the president to take charge, get angry, act mad?

Most of us got tired of Freudian foreign policy under Bush, when it was common to speculate that the entire Iraq invasion came because Shrub had something to prove. And here we are again if a general and a president are at odds—it must be a manhood-measuring contest.

War is about many things. If you believe the loudest US voices, the war in Afghanistan is about revenge, security, terrorism, rebuilding, some even talk these days about democracy. You won’t find many challenges to any of that in the money media—when the two parties agree, the media tends to go along. And so it is now, with the tale about boys and their toys.

If you weren’t cynical enough, this will do it. Instead of a serious discussion of McChrystal’s record and policy—this is a man who was in charge when torture happened, who was in charge for the Tillman cover-up, who seems to disagree completely with the president’s stated policy for Afghanistan and the electorate’s stated wish for a draw down. This is the man who told Rolling Stone itself that US forces have killed "an amazing number of civilians" for no good reason in Afghanistan. Instead of any of that—the media focuses on manliness.

A change in leadership in Afghanistan should be cause for rethinking the entire policy. Instead, the press is only concerned with who’s got the biggest… mouth.

 

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv which broadcasts weekdays on satellite TV (Dish Network Ch. 9415 Free Speech TV) on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Support us by signing up for our podcast, and follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter.com.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x