Why the New US-Russian Cold War May Be More Dangerous Than the Last

Why the New US-Russian Cold War May Be More Dangerous Than the Last

Why the New US-Russian Cold War May Be More Dangerous Than the Last

As the Minsk accord seems to collapse, new military dangers loom.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussion of the increasingly dangerous crisis in US/NATO-Russian relations. Cohen emphasizes that as the Minsk agreement to negotiate the Ukrainian civil and proxy war is being rejected by all participants (except Moscow), the New Cold War is rapidly being militarized and spreading to many countries in Eastern Europe. The result may be a confrontation more dangerous than the preceding 40-year Cold War, for several reasons: its epicenter is not in Berlin but on Russia’s borders; unlike during that cold war, there are no shared rules of behavior or, as evidenced by the apparent collapse of the Minsk accord, ongoing diplomacy; and a new nuclear arms race is beginning without the traditional arms control process. Also discussed is whether the upcoming summit in Russia of Shanghai Cooperation and BRICS nations indicates that the Obama administration’s policy of “isolating Putin’s Russia” has failed and instead spurred a process toward a “multipolar” world order. Positions taken, or not taken, on the crisis by current candidates for the US presidency are also examined.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x