Puzzling Women

Puzzling Women

Where are the female constructors?

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Why is the world of crossword puzzles such a damn boy’s club? This question was raised a couple of weeks ago—a bit less bluntly and far more eloquently—in a splendidly impassioned essay at The American Reader by Anna Schechtman. Schechtman can speak with some authority on the subject—at 23, she has already established herself as one of the more inventive figures in the wave of young constructors that have helped revitalize the field.

And Schechtman’s critique of the field in which she is making her mark pulls no punches. Citing data compiled by her fellow wunderkind, the 17-year-old puzzle whiz David Steinberg, about the authorship of the New York Times puzzle over the decades, she lays out the problem with convincing fervor. Not only are women hugely underrepresented among Times constructors, but the gap has steadily widened over the years.

In our little corner of the puzzle world, that of cryptic crosswords, the gender imbalance is even more pronounced. The only woman publishing cryptics on a regular basis in North America is Emily Cox, one half of the pre-eminent constructing team known as Hex. In the UK, the predominance of male voices is no less striking.

There are a number of possible explanations for this situation, all of them unsatisfactory to varying degrees. Steinberg, in a talk at the most recent American Crossword Puzzle Tournament that prompted Schechtman’s article, evidently proposed that the growing use of computer software to construct crosswords may have tipped the field further toward the male-heavy gender breakdown seen in the world of tech.

Schechtman retails a suggestion by the crossword editor and blogger Amy Reynaldo that crossword construction was once a pursuit for stay-at-home moms who have long since entered the workforce. And Schechtman puts the spotlight directly and uncomfortably on the editors—the Times’s Will Shortz chief among them—who act as gatekeepers to the nation’s puzzle pages.

The cause of the imbalance is probably some combination of these factors, and others yet undetermined. But one way or another, it’s past time to see it corrected.

This week’s clueing challenge: GENDER GAP. To comment (and see other readers’ comments), please click on this post’s title and scroll to the bottom of the resulting screen. And now, four links:
* The current puzzle
* Our puzzle-solving guidelines | PDF
* Our e-books (solve past puzzles on your iOS device—many hints provided by the software!)
* A Nation puzzle solver’s blog where every one of our clues is explained in detail. This is also where you can post quibbles, questions, kudos or complaints about the current puzzle, as well as ask for hints.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x