Why Ending ‘Stand Your Ground’ Isn’t Enough to Prevent Another Trayvon Martin

Why Ending ‘Stand Your Ground’ Isn’t Enough to Prevent Another Trayvon Martin

Why Ending ‘Stand Your Ground’ Isn’t Enough to Prevent Another Trayvon Martin

There's nothing natural about black boys dying at age 17. We have to stop acting as if there is. 

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket


Protesters gather at a rally for Trayvon Martin in New York City's Union Square on March 21st, 2013

Yesterday, on what would have been Trayvon Martin’s eighteenth birthday, Representative Frederica Wilson, a Democrat from South Florida, introduced a resolution to honor the slain teen and, according to a statement from her office, urge “the repeal of Stand Your Ground laws, and calling on the United States government to address the crisis of racial profiling.” The statement further reads:

Today, Trayvon Martin would have celebrated his 18th birthday. We all know the tragic circumstances surrounding his murder: Trayvon was racially profiled, chased, made to fight for his life, and ultimately murdered. Yet we as a nation have yet to take substantive action to stop such a heartbreaking incident from happening again. Enough is enough: We as a nation have buried too many young black boys. Let’s set Congress on course to address the underlying causes behind the crisis that Trayvon’s death symbolizes. Let’s take action to stop racial profiling and give our people a chance to succeed.

Wilson is right. We haven’t taken substantive action toward making sure what happened to Trayvon doesn’t happen again. A report from the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement found that at the halfway point of last year, something killings similar to Trayvon’s occurred about 120 times, or once every thirty-six hours. Yet, here we are, nearly a year after Trayvon’s death captivated a nation, and the best we have managed is a resolution in his honor.

I support the language of Wilson’s resolution, though I would replace “racial” profiling with racist profiling, as to my mind the former doesn’t capture the entirety problem. But it also leaves me feeling as if we lack the will to grapple with the big questions that would ultimately lead us to the answers we truly need.

In the wake of such tragedies, we collectively feel the impulse to do something, because we don’t want the deaths of our loved ones to be in vain. But what we end up doing is making ourselves better prepared for the next time it happens, rather than trying to prevent it from happening altogether. We treat these things as naturally intractable parts of the human experience, when the truth is, there’s nothing natural about black boys dying at age 17.

But after Trayvon’s death, we focused much of our energy on discussing the Stand Your Ground law, which is a truly indefensible and overreaching law that grants more latitude than should be given in cases of self-defense. The problem isn’t that we want it repealed, but that Stand Your Ground isn’t what killed Trayvon; it’s what might help George Zimmerman get away with it. And as much as I have written and advocated for reducing the number of and access to guns, it wasn’t just the gun in Zimmerman’s hand that shot Trayvon. It was a historic rendering of black men as enemies of the state, menaces to society, threats to the American way of life, that caused Trayvon to lose his life that day. How do you legislate against that?

We can pass more and strengthen current racial profiling laws, but that only addresses the problem after the fact. We have to be more proactive and solutions oriented before our kids end up in the grave. Similar to “Ten Things to End Rape Culture” published here at The Nation, we need plans of action that start on a community level to root out racism before it gets a chance to pull another trigger. Or else we’ll be back here, again and again, passing more resolutions in honor of the fallen, wondering what can be done to prevent another tragedy like this from happening.

A conservative reaction to Michelle Obama's praise for Beyonce's Super Bowl show reveals racist and sexist expectations, Mychal Denzel Smith writes.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x