The US Needs China in the Korea Crisis

The US Needs China in the Korea Crisis

The US Needs China in the Korea Crisis

Obama’s pivot to Asia had better be a friendly one where Beijing is concerned.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Truth be told, the worst thing in the world that could happen—next to a nuclear war between Pakistan and India—would be a nuclear conflict in northeast Asia and the Korean peninsula. In both cases, millions, or tens of millions, could die. And it’s possible to envision a disoriented, paranoid North Korean leadership triggering a war with South Korea and its allies, with the ever-present danger that such a war could escalate if North Korea used its stockpile of nuclear bombs. In addition, the flow of countless refugees across the border into China would likely involve Beijing in the crisis instantly.

It’s far too early to suggest that such a doomsday scenario, though possible, is likely. But the crisis in the Koreas arises just as the Obama administration has executed a highly publicized “pivot” toward Asia. The White House is telling anyone who’ll listen that the end of the war in Iraq and the winding down of the war in Afghanistan by 2014 signals a new focus on China and the Pacific. The Korea crisis means that the United States will need China more than ever as a partner for peace and stability in the region.

The Obama administration, caught off guard by the sudden passing of Kim Jong Il, has adopted a wait-and-see attitude, and they’ve made it clear that they don’t expect much to happen in the immediate period of “mourning” in the wake Kim’s death. Kim’s young ‘un, Kim Jong Un, may or may not hold the reins of power. The reports about the young leader, and more broadly on North Korean affairs, reveal that U.S. intelligence is almost completely ignorant about what’s happening, and what might happen.

If anyone knows, it’s China. The late Kim earned frequent-flyer points back and forth to China, and he made a point of introducing his son to Chinese leaders. China has a huge stake in North Korea, but although Beijing won’t be a friend of democratization there, to put it mildly, above all China wants stability and urgently wants to avoid conflict. In that it has common interests with the United States, which means that the United States needs China.

As Robert Carlin, a Stanford University fellow who travels to North Korea, told the New York Times:

“At this moment, China might provide the best chance of stability. They want to be the best informed and have a modicum of influence and have people consulting with them at his moment. The rest of us are deaf, dumb and blind and with our arms tied behind our backs.”

I don’t know about the deaf and blind part, but dumb certainly applies to people like Senator John McCain, who in the past called for a naval embargo against North Korea and who loves to rattle sabers. Expect loud noises from the right, and let’s hope that the White House has its earplugs in tight.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x