An Offensive Response to the Budget ‘Crisis’

An Offensive Response to the Budget ‘Crisis’

An Offensive Response to the Budget ‘Crisis’

Deficit hawks across the political spectrum and the tea partiers claim America is broke. It isn’t. We can deal with our debt by taxing extreme concentrations of wealth.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Editor’s Note: The Wall Street Journal asked a number of“influential voices” for their take on the budget deal struck by President Obama and Speaker John Boehner. Katrina vanden Heuvel’s response appears below. Click here to read all of the responses.

A budget is more than a passel of numbers. It is a statement of a country’s values and priorities. And the priorities in the budget deal struck Friday night offend.

Republicans have doubled down on their reverse Robin Hood agenda. When they speak of “fiscal responsibility,“ get out your decoder ring. Because what they really mean is that middle-class and working Americans should shoulder the responsibility of tackling debts and deficits. And—natch—in this budget, the toughest cuts will come from education and health.

President Obama has succeeded in limiting the damage. But so far, the president has failed to challenge the inside-the-Beltway narrative of debt and deficit “crisis,” or lay out a vision of a government working for the common good. It’s time to reset the debate and focus on rebuilding an already frayed social contract. Poll after poll shows that majorities of Americans put jobs ahead of deficit reduction.

An honest discussion would address the real source of our long-term debt: not Social Security and Medicare, not so-called entitlements, but a broken healthcare system dominated by powerful drug, insurance and hospital lobbies. A people’s budget would champion a fair tax system and call for an end to costly wars that are breeding insecurity.

Deficit hawks across the political spectrum and the tea partiers claim America is broke. It isn’t. We are a rich nation. Our trouble is that Washington (with a few exceptions) is bankrupt intellectually.

It’s time to tax what we have too much of—financial speculation and extreme concentration of wealth—and invest in what we have too little of—education programs like Head Start, infrastructure, renewable energy and jobs.

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x