Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

Greg Mitchell and Daniel Ellsberg on the WikiLeaks Document Dump

The morning after WikiLeaks began releasing its trove of confidential US diplomatic cables, Democracy Now! hosts a round-table about the possible impact of these leaks.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

Yesterday, the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks began releasing their giant trove of confidential US diplomatic cables. This morning, Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman summarizes some of these documents’ revelations, which include evidence of Arab leaders urging the US to attack Iran, the US using its embassies as part of a global spy network and the US asking diplomats to gather intelligence.

In a Democracy Now! round-table discussion with Pentagon Papers whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg; The Nation’s Greg Mitchell, who has been blogging about WikiLeaks on Media Fix, Carne Ross, a British diplomat who resigned before the Iraq war and As’ad AbuKhalil, a professor of political science at California State University, Ellsberg says that "It is too early to judge the values and dangers" of the new WikiLeaks documents, but he reminds viewers that "not one single soldier or informant has been in danger from any of the WikiLeaks releases….That risk has been largely overblown."

Greg Mitchell agrees that it is too early to assess the WikiLeaks documents, but he compares the new batch of WikiLeaks documents with the previous releases from July and October of this year. Mitchell says that while the earlier documents garnered "one-day stories," media coverage about the new WikiLeaks information "will be emerging over the next nine days in the New York Times for example, and WikiLeaks has said on their own site that it will be going on for months."

Stay tuned for more breaking news coverage of the WikiLeaks releases from Greg Mitchell on Media Fix.

—Joanna Chiu

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x