News and Features
The future of the Supreme Court is the most important issue in the most important election year since 1932. Progressive Americans should treat it that way. The radical right does.
At stake is whether the twenty-first-century First Amendment will be a protector of the powerful or a resource for the weak and disfranchised.
The current Supreme Court is so divided on fundamental questions of separation of church and state. that the appointment of one or two conservative Justices could well tip the balance and jettison key historical principles.
The Rehnquist Court's paeans of praise for state government are belied by reality.
I still think third-party politics is mostly a crock, but then, so is two-party politics.
Selma, Alabama, a touchstone in the civil rights movement, is frozen in
a way that confounds onlookers.
"The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from
religion," Senator Joseph Lieberman told a rapturous audience at a black
church a few Sundays ago, just after being chosen as
First, the obvious part.
Research support: the Investigative
Fund of the Nation Institute. Additional reporting: Edmundo
President Bush was not deterred by lack of expertise when it came to deciding a highly specialized scientific issue.
- Five Israeli Talking Points on Gaza—Debunked
- Here’s What Happens When an NFL Player Beats His Fiancée Unconscious
- On Israel-Palestine and BDS: Chomsky Replies
- Paul Ryan’s Faux Populism Isn’t Going to End Poverty or Reduce Inequality
- Why Is a Nice Network Like MSNBC Silencing Protest Over Pro-Israeli Coverage?
Facebook Like Box