What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

What We Mean When We Say States’ Rights

This week sees the 150th anniversary of the secession of South Carolina—the beginning of the U.S. Civil War. And of course, the anniversary brings with it the predictable repetition of myths: the South seceded because those Northern elites wouldn’t let them govern themselves! It was about states’ rights and freedom.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

This week sees the 150th anniversary of the secession of South Carolina—the beginning of the US Civil War. And of course, the anniversary brings with it the predictable repetition of myths: the South seceded because those Northern elites wouldn’t let them govern themselves! It was about states’ rights and freedom. Right?

Author Edward Ball, who comes from a slave-owning southern family, reminds us that that’s not exactly the case. Simply read the states’ secession declarations: from Georgia to Mississippi, and of course, South Carolina, they all name continuing slavery as their top concern.

In a recent op-ed, Ball noted that just as the Southern states flattered themselves that they were enacting a new American Revolution, so too, the Tea Party crowd evokes that same revolutionary imagery around state freedom.

And it’d be funny if it didn’t pack such political punch. When Governor Rick Perry wonders aloud whether Texas could secede if it didn’t like laws of Congress, you can sit back and wonder how long it’ll be before he comes back to Washington for help with his ballooning state deficit.

But it’s not necessarily what happens that’s as important as what’s said. Some of the people pushing lawsuits against Obama’s health care plan, are also pushing for a constitutional amendment that would give states the right to overturn federal law. They too call it a strike for freedom.

And while it’s tempting to laugh at Washington politicians grandstanding about Washington power while they run for DC office, it’s hard not to important to remember that states’ rights as a rallying cry has a long and nasty history, and one based more often than not in race. From secession to integration to busing schoolchildren, politicians and public figures have trumpeted the idea of “states’ rights” to keep those pesky liberals from telling them how to treat people of color.

And now once again the specter of nullification raises its head, and though it’s unlikely to pass, it’s worth asking whether this has more to do with the color of the skin of the man who passed the bill than any contents of the health care legislation.

The F Word is a regular commentary by Laura Flanders, the host of GRITtv and editor of At The Tea Party, out now from OR Books. GRITtv broadcasts weekdays on DISH Network and DIRECTv, on cable, and online at GRITtv.org and TheNation.com. Follow GRITtv or GRITlaura on Twitter and be our friend on Facebook.

 
Like this blog post? Read all Nation blogs on the Nation’s free iPhone App, NationNow.
NationNow iPhone App
 

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x