{Empty title} | The Nation

Nobody can even define "global warming" nor can they state its cause nor can they prove its a problem and they have no clue as to the cost to "fix" it.

Its all emotional nonsense.

So, to state that environmentalism is an "effective engine of economic growth" is as useful as stating that paying people to dig holes and fill them back up is also an "effective engine of economic growth."

Both sound silly.