The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The Breakdown: In an Age of Austerity, Can’t the US Cut the Military Budget?

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the US could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

Facebook
Twitter
Email
Flipboard
Pocket

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet. On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the U.S. could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

The US maintains the most expansive and expensive military on the planet.  More than half of the annual budget goes towards “defense.”  But in the ongoing debates about the appropriate austerity measures to take, cuts to military spending have been insufficiently prioritized.  On this week’s edition of The Breakdown, D.C. Editor Chris Hayes and Institute for Policy Studies Research Fellow Miriam Pemberton discuss just how much the US could afford to cut Pentagon spending while maintaining its status as the dominant military force in the world.

Resources

Miriam Pemberton on the misleading nature of military spending “cuts”:
Center for American Progress article on reducing military spending:
Robert Dreyfuss discussing the “civil war” in the GOP over demilitarization:
Barney Frank on cutting NATO spending: “It Serves No Strategic Purpose”
The Independent’s Robert Fisk discusses the costs of war in the Middle East:

Subscribe to The Breakdown on iTunes to listen to fresh takes on the confusing concepts that make politics, economics and government tick. A new episode every week!

Thank you for reading The Nation!

We hope you enjoyed the story you just read. It’s just one of many examples of incisive, deeply-reported journalism we publish—journalism that shifts the needle on important issues, uncovers malfeasance and corruption, and uplifts voices and perspectives that often go unheard in mainstream media. For nearly 160 years, The Nation has spoken truth to power and shone a light on issues that would otherwise be swept under the rug.

In a critical election year as well as a time of media austerity, independent journalism needs your continued support. The best way to do this is with a recurring donation. This month, we are asking readers like you who value truth and democracy to step up and support The Nation with a monthly contribution. We call these monthly donors Sustainers, a small but mighty group of supporters who ensure our team of writers, editors, and fact-checkers have the resources they need to report on breaking news, investigative feature stories that often take weeks or months to report, and much more.

There’s a lot to talk about in the coming months, from the presidential election and Supreme Court battles to the fight for bodily autonomy. We’ll cover all these issues and more, but this is only made possible with support from sustaining donors. Donate today—any amount you can spare each month is appreciated, even just the price of a cup of coffee.

The Nation does not bow to the interests of a corporate owner or advertisers—we answer only to readers like you who make our work possible. Set up a recurring donation today and ensure we can continue to hold the powerful accountable.

Thank you for your generosity.

Ad Policy
x