Seat Senator Franken

Comment

By John Nichols

This article appeared in the May 4, 2009 edition of The Nation.

April 15, 2009

On matters of policy, Senate Republicans are entitled to play the party of no. But when it comes to forming a functional Senate and assuring that Minnesotans are represented, they have strayed far beyond the bounds of fair positioning. They are not just saying no; they are erecting unreasonable barriers to the seating of duly elected Senator Al Franken.

The contest between Republican incumbent Norm Coleman and Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party challenger Franken was agonizingly close, with Franken prevailing by just 312 votes in what should be the final count. Reviews by the bipartisan State Canvassing Board and a three-judge panel appointed by the Minnesota Supreme Court were exhaustive and appropriate. But Coleman has lost at every turn, with the jurists determining April 13 that "Franken received the highest number of lawfully cast ballots in the November 4, 2008, general election." The judges heard all Coleman's complaints and still concluded that the election "was conducted fairly, impartially and accurately."

Coleman has exhausted every reasonable appeal. Unfortunately, he has not exhausted the resources of Senate Republicans, who seem willing to fill his coffers in order to keep vacant a seat that has been won by a Democrat they particularly dislike. Coleman intends to appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court, which is all but certain to agree with the judicial panel--then Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, a Democrat who has patiently and responsibly overseen the recount, is expected to sign a certificate of election for Franken. Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, a Republican with presidential ambitions, will then be in a position to clear the way for seating Franken. But Coleman's lawyers hint at plans to mount extended appeals in the federal courts, which could give Pawlenty an excuse to keep the seat vacant for another six months. That's an abuse of the recount process. Ritchie should sign the certificate, as should Pawlenty, whose responsibility is to respect the will of his state's voters and their right to representation. It is time to end the charade and seat Senator Franken.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About John Nichols

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written The Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about politics for The Nation magazine as its Washington correspondent. He is a contributing writer for The Progressive and In These Times and the associate editor of the Capital Times, the daily newspaper in Madison, Wisconsin. His articles have appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and dozens of other newspapers.

more...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Around the Nation | The week we went Rouge. Plus, Moyers on Afghanistan.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
39 Comments

» The Beat

Health Care Bill Advances, as Harry Reid Trumps Sarah Palin | The death panelist-in-chief rallied her followers to "KILL THE BILL." But 60 senators decided to follow the real leader.
John Nichols
44 Comments

» The Notion

Palin as the Church Lady | Going Rogue book tour brings passive-aggressive rightwing Christianity to the fore.
Leslie Savan
139 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | The "Second Amendment" sale; the raving paranoids of the right.
Eric Alterman

» The Dreyfuss Report

Chongqing: Socialism in One City | China is managing the most important event in the world: the urbanization of half a billion people. Fast.
Robert Dreyfuss
212 Comments

» Act Now!

Toward Copenhagen | A guide to joining the movement against climate change.
Peter Rothberg
74 Comments