Guilty of Driving a Truck

Comment

By David Cole

This article appeared in the September 1, 2008 edition of The Nation.

August 13, 2008

On August 6, a mere six and a half years after it brought its first prisoners to Guantánamo Bay, the Bush Administration obtained its first conviction from a military tribunal. White House spokesman Tony Fratto proclaimed that the trial of Salim Hamdan demonstrated that the Military Commissions Act (MCA) provides "a fair and appropriate legal process for prosecuting detainees." John Wesley Hall, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, had a more sober assessment, suggesting that the government "must be very proud of itself" for "convict[ing] a truck driver of being guilty of driving a truck."

After all, Hamdan could hardly be described as "the worst of the worst," as Donald Rumsfeld described the original men brought to Guantánamo. Hamdan was not convicted of engaging in or planning terrorist activity of any kind, much less 9/11. He was acquitted on all the conspiracy charges; the government obtained convictions only for "material support" to terrorism, an extremely expansive charge that was created by the MCA in 2006 and applied, ex post facto, to Hamdan for truck driving that predated the law he allegedly violated. And he will serve only five or six months after getting credit for time served.

The Administration had sought desperately to complete a trial before the end of Bush's term. But Hamdan's conviction is unlikely to do anything to repair the damage Guantánamo has done to the US reputation. Only a fair and transparent process could hope to overcome the worldwide skepticism the past six years have created. But the MCA permits introduction of coerced testimony so long as it was obtained through methods short of torture, and the world has seen that this Administration has an extraordinarily expansive view of what constitutes interrogation short of torture. Pursuant to MCA rules, much of the trial took place in secret, closed proceedings--including virtually all aspects that considered Hamdan's claims that his confessions were coerced. His lawyers were forbidden even to mention the CIA, which interrogated him before his transfer to Guantánamo.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About David Cole

David Cole is The Nation's legal affairs correspondent. His latest book is The Torture Memos: Rationalizing the Unthinkable (New Press). more...
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

House Passes Health Reform, But Without Reproductive Rights | Pelosi secures necessary votes, but only after allowing anti-choice Dems to bar access to abortion in new programs.
John Nichols
139 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
9 Comments

» The Notion

Injustice in Illinois | Prosecutors in Illinois should be more concerned with an innocent man behind bars than journalism students' grades.
Ari Berman
28 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

Obama Fails in Middle East | Clinton delivers the ultimate diss to Abbas.
Robert Dreyfuss
138 Comments

» Act Now!

Equality Across America | This week, young LBGT activists are staging a National Week of Initiative.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman