Noted.

This article appeared in the July 14, 2008 edition of The Nation.

June 26, 2008

DOLEFUL DOLLARS: Barack Obama's decision to forgo public financing for his presidential campaign is at once understandable and unfortunate. Obama's low estimation of a system plagued by loopholes, lobbyists and smear-ready 527s is appropriate--"public financing...is broken, and we face opponents who have become masters at gaming this system," he explained. There is a clear strategic rationale for employing his $168 million fundraising advantage to beat John McCain in November. Obama has pledged to overhaul the system once he reaches the White House--his support for the Fair Elections Now Act in the Senate shows a commitment to this issue--and though it's a bitter pill to swallow, some campaign finance reformers are giving him the benefit of the doubt. "His decision today is not one that furthers reform in the short run," read a statement from the Public Campaign Action Fund, but Obama "now has a special obligation to make passage of comprehensive public financing of all federal elections a priority if elected."

Others are less sanguine, like Senate colleague and staunch reformer Russ Feingold, who said flatly, "This is not a good decision." Obama made an early vow to work within the system, and the campaign promised to "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election." His change of heart rightly raises questions about his commitment to a politics free from special interests.

Although Obama speaks of a "grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans" that has "fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20," the truth is, his campaign is largely reliant on corporate millions and at times has been misleadingly vague about its donor base. In a February debate, Obama claimed, "We have now raised 90 percent of our donations from small donors," a figure his campaign reiterated after the public financing decision.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Notion

The Just Say No Democrats | Conservative Democrats voting against healthcare reform represent constituents most in need of insurance.
Ari Berman
Posted 5 minutes ago

» Act Now!

The Wall Comes Down | It was twenty years ago today. Watch it live.
Peter Rothberg
16 Comments
Posted at 10:44 ET

» The Beat

Six Smart Progressive Complaints About House Health Bill | Women's groups, patient advocates, unions, anti-corporate congressmen explain what's wrong with "reform" measure as it now stands.
John Nichols
54 Comments
Posted at 10:23 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

The Deal with Iran | The alarmists, and Bibi, should shut up. There's plenty of time to make the deal with Iran work.
Robert Dreyfuss
16 Comments
Posted at 8:32 ET

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Obama, one year on. Plus: Jeremy Scahill takes your questions, and a new video series from The Nation.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
49 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Thursday | Dying laptops, recapping the election, the Dow, and the Yankees with the World Series.
Eric Alterman