In an open letter to ABC, journalists and media analysts condemn the network's poor handling of the April 16 Democratic presidential debate.
Even the studio audience was disgusted with Charles Gibson and George Stephanopoulos.
-
McCain and the Meltdown
Robert Sherrill's pathbreaking 1990 exposé of the savings and loan scandal sheds light on John McCain's deregulatory politics--and our current financial crisis.
-
Free Association: The Pirate's Dilemma Gets Dissected
-
Radio Free Youth
The precursor for young people's new media may be found in three decades of community radio.
-
From Slingshots to Solutions: Goals for Organizers
Matthew Birkhold & Calvin Williams | The recent RNC demonstrations reveal that activists have some work to do.
-
Youthiness: A DNC and RNC Convention Scorecard
Sarah Burris | With young voter interest on the rise, how well did the parties represent young voters at the recent Republican and Democratic National Conventions?
-
Now What?: An Interview With an Iraq Veteran
De Nishia Yearby | Kareem Lawrence is trying to adjust to his daily life after returning wounded, and angry, from two tours of Iraq.
-
Outlaws: Andrew Edwards and Jeff Fontas
Speaking with the youngest legislators in the country.
We, the undersigned, deplore the conduct of ABC's George Stephanopoulos and Charles Gibson at the Democratic Presidential debate on April 16. The debate was a revolting descent into tabloid journalism and a gross disservice to Americans concerned about the great issues facing the nation and the world. This is not the first Democratic or Republican presidential debate to emphasize gotcha questions over real discussion. However, it is, so far, the worst.
For 53 minutes, we heard no question about public policy from either moderator. ABC seemed less interested in provoking serious discussion than in trying to generate cheap shot sound-bites for later rebroadcast. The questions asked by Mr. Stephanopoulos and Mr. Gibson were a disgrace, and the subsequent attempts to justify them by claiming that they reflect citizens' interest are an insult to the intelligence of those citizens and ABC's viewers. Many thousands of those viewers have already written to ABC to express their outrage.
The moderators' occasional later forays into substance were nearly as bad. Mr. Gibson's claim that the government can raise revenues by cutting capital gains tax is grossly at odds with what taxation experts believe. Both candidates tried, repeatedly, to bring debate back to the real problems faced by ordinary Americans. Neither moderator allowed them to do this.
We're at a crucial moment in our country's history, facing war, a terrorism threat, recession, and a range of big domestic challenges. Large majorities of our fellow Americans tell pollsters they're deeply worried about the country's direction. In such a context, journalists moderating a debate--who are, after all, entrusted with free public airwaves--have a particular responsibility to push and engage the candidates in serious debate about these matters. Tough, probing questions on these issues clearly serve the public interest. Demands that candidates make pledges about a future no one can predict or excessive emphasis on tangential "character" issues do not. This applies to candidates of both parties.
Neither Mr. Gibson nor Mr. Stephanopoulos lived up to these responsibilities. In the words of Tom Shales of the Washington Post, Mr. Gibson and Mr. Stephanopoulos turned in "shoddy, despicable performances." As Greg Mitchell of Editor and Publisher describes it, the debate was a "travesty." We hope that the public uproar over ABC's miserable showing will encourage a return to serious journalism in debates between the Democratic and Republican nominees this fall. Anything less would be a betrayal of the basic responsibilities that journalists owe to their public.
Spencer Ackerman, The
Washington Independent
Eric Alterman, City University of New York
Dean Baker, The American Prospect
Online
Steven Benen, The
Carpetbagger Report
Julie Bergman Sender, Balcony Films
Ari Berman, The Nation
Brian Beutler, The Media
Consortium
Michael Bérubé, Crooked Timber,
The Pennsylvania State University
Joel Bleifuss, In These
Times
Sam Boyd, The American
Prospect
Lakshmi Chaudry, In These
Times
Joe Conason, Journalist and Author
Brad DeLong, Brad DeLong's
Semi-Daily Journal and UC Berkeley
Kevin Drum, The Washington
Monthly
Henry Farrell, Crooked Timber,
George Washington University
James Galbraith, University of Texas at Austin
Todd Gitlin, Columbia University, TPM Cafe
Merrill Goozner (formerly Chicago Tribune)
Ilan Goldenberg, The National
Security Network
Robert Greenwald, Brave New
Films
Christopher Hayes, The Nation
Don Hazen, Alternet
Michael Kazin, Georgetown University
Ed Kilgore, The Democratic Strategist
Richard Kim, The Nation
Ezra Klein, The American Prospect
Mark Kleiman, UCLA/The Reality Based Community
Scott McLemee, Inside Higher Ed
Ari Melber, The Nation
Rick Perlstein, Campaign for America's Future
Katha Pollitt, The Nation
David Roberts, Grist
Thomas Schaller, Columnist, The
Baltimore Sun
Mark Schmitt, The New America
Foundation
Adele Stan, The Media
Consortium
Jonathan Stein, Mother Jones
Magazine
Mark Thoma, The Economist's
View
Michael Tomasky, The
Guardian
Cenk Uygur, The Young
Turks
Tracy Van Slyke, The Media
Consortium
Kai Wright, The Root
- Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!
- If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mixx it!
Reddit
RSS