One day before the Iowa caucuses, John Edwards has become the first major presidential candidate to favor withdrawing all American troops, including advisers, from Iraq, doing so in response to queries from a leading military correspondent, Michael Gordon, of the New York Times.
-
Clintons in Denial
Tom Hayden: Tuesday's elections show the Clintons are beyond persuasion or capable of thinking beyond their own interests.
-
Dreaming Obama in North Carolina
Tom Hayden: Conversations with historian John Hope Franklin and civil rights heroes about race, memory and the possibility of change.
-
Why Hillary Makes My Wife Scream
Tom Hayden: By trying to inflict maximum damage on Obama, she's threatening the Democratic Party's chances for the White House. Progressives need to intervene.
-
Progressives for Obama
Progressives, Liberals, & The American Left
Tom Hayden, Bill Fletcher Jr., Danny Glover & Barbara Ehrenreich: The future has arrived: progressives can make a difference to ensure Barack Obama is our next President.
-
Reviving Vietnam War Tactics
Tom Hayden: One of Gen. Petraeus's top advisors advocates a return to the global Phoenix program used during the Vietnam War.
-
Washington-Based Antiwar Coalition Re-emerges
Tom Hayden: Targets McCain, Iraq costs.
-
A Meeting of Minds
Tom Hayden: Thursday's debate revealed Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama as solid progressives in sync with the broad base of the Democratic Party.
In the front-page Times interview, the traditionally hawkish Gordon asked Edwards whether his proposal would "pull the rug out" from the Iraqi security forces, and pointed out several times that Edwards's position is at odds with "senior American military commanders." However, Gordon failed to note that one such military leader, Gen. James Jones, while supporting more training of the Iraqi security forces, has reported that those forces are sectarian and dysfunctional and even called for "scrapping" the national police force now conducting counterinsurgency under the command of General David Petraeus.
Edwards' thinking seems to flow from his populist orientation: "I honestly believe this in my soul, we are propping up their bad behavior", he told Gordon, "I mean really, how many American lives and how much American taxpayer money are we going to continue to expend waiting for these [Iraqi] political leaders to do something?"
The political impact of Edwards's statement is unpredictable. It may sway some Bill Richardson or Dennis Kucinich voters to caucus instead for Edwards on Thursday night. It may cause a few defections from Clinton or Obama. It may play out in New Hampshire and later primaries, if Edwards is deemed "viable" by the media after Iowa. And to the extent that Edwards's campaign continues to be a force in the national election, his Iraq position could become a rallying point in the Democratic platform debate.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Newsvine
Reddit