During a week of mayhem in Iraq, in which terrorists have rightly been condemned for targeting schoolchildren, it is sobering to recall that this week is also the 62nd anniversary of a US attack that deliberately took the lives of thousands of children on their way to school in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As noted in the Strategic Bombing Survey conducted at President Harry Truman's request, when the bomb hit Hiroshima on April 6, 1945, "nearly all the school children...were at work in the open," to be exploded, irradiated or incinerated in the perfect firestorm that the planners back at the University of California-run Los Alamos lab had envisioned for the bomb's maximum psychological impact.
Robert Scheer is editor of TruthDig, where this essay originally was published.
-
Boston Tea Party, 2008
Robert Scheer: Fear-mongering pundits and pols question the patriotism of lawmakers and taxpayers who oppose the bailout. They've got it all wrong.
-
Financial Fascism
Robert Scheer: Henry Paulson isn't proposing the nationalization of private corporations--he wants a corporate takeover of government.
-
Obama: Find Your Inner Populist
Robert Scheer: To win this election and save the country, Obama must renounce the scoundrels from both parties who plunged us into economic crisis.
-
McCain and the Mortgage Meltdown
Robert Scheer: John McCain's fingerprints are all over our current financial crisis.
-
Alaska's Windfall Profits
Robert Scheer: Why is it a good thing for Alaskans to get a cut of exorbitant oil company profits, but not the rest of us, if we are all part of one nation?
-
The Cold War President
Robert Scheer: He lacks the chops to deal with our economic crisis, so McCain's best strategy is to run as the President who'll fight the next cold war. Scary thing: he might win.
-
McCain's Warped Worldview
Robert Scheer: His irrational mix of patriotic swagger and blindness to reality is proving disturbingly successful with millions of uninformed voters.
- Most Read
-
- » McCain's Kremlin Ties
- » Bright, Shiny Object
- » The Palin Fix
- » Tina Fey Reprises Palin's VP Debate
- » McCain and the POW Cover-up
- » Born-Again Democracy
- » Obama's Bailout Strategy
- » Paulson Bailout Plan a Historic Swindle
- » Sarah Palin's Extreme Sports
- » Decline and Fall
- » Obama Under the Weather
- » Tina Fey Takes On Sarah Palin
- » The McCain-Follieri Love Boat
Like most of the others killed by the two American bombs, neither the children nor the adults had any role in Japan's decision to go to war, but they were picked as the target instead of an isolated but fortified military base whose antiaircraft fire posed a higher risk. The target preferred by US atomic scientists--a patch in the ocean or unpopulated terrain--was rejected, because the effect of hundreds of thousands of civilians dying would be all the more dramatic.
The victims in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were available soft targets, much like the children playing in Iraq, suddenly caught in the crossfire of battles waged beyond their control. In White Light/Black Rain, a devastating HBO documentary released this week, there is an interview with the sole survivor of a Japanese elementary school of 620 students. The murder of the other 619, and the 370,000 overall deaths attributed to the bombings, 85 percent of which were civilian deaths, has never compelled a widespread examination of the "end justifies the means" morality of our own state-sanctioned acts of terror. Indeed, the horrifying footage taken by Japanese and American cameramen soon after the devastation, and shown in the HBO film, was long kept secret by the US government for fear that an informed American public might question this nation's incipient nuclear arms race.
Just exactly what distinguishes the United States' use of the ever-so-cutely-named "Fat Man" and "Little Boy" atomic bombs on cities in Japan from the car bombs of Baghdad or the planes that smashed into the World Trade Center? To even raise the question, as was found in one recent university case, can be a career-ending move.
Of course, we had our justifications, as terrorists always do. Truman defended his decision to drop the atomic bombs on civilians over the objection of leading atomic scientists on the grounds that it was a necessary military action to save lives by forcing a quick Japanese surrender. He insisted on that imperative despite the objections of top military figures, including General Dwight Eisenhower, who contended that the war would end quickly without dropping the bomb.
The subsequent release of formerly secret documents makes a hash of Truman's rationalization. His White House was fully informed that the Japanese were on the verge of collapse, and their surrender was made all the more likely by the Soviets' imminent entry into the fight.
At most, the Japanese were asking for the face-saving gesture of retaining their emperor, and even that modest demand would likely have been abandoned with the shift of massive numbers of Allied troops and firepower from the battlefront of a defeated Germany to a confrontation with its deeply wounded Asian ally. Instead, the US played midwife to the birth of the nuclear monster, the ultimate terrorist weapon that presents a continuing and growing threat to the survival of human life on Earth.
This is a lesson to be pondered at a time when President Bush plays power games with a nuclear-equipped Russia while coddling Pakistan, the main proliferator of nuclear weapons to rogue regimes, and Congress authorizes an expansion of the US nuclear program to better fight the war on terror by "improving" the ultimate weapon of terror, which the US alone stands guilty of using.
More information: For a fuller explanation of the suppression of footage taken shortly after the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks, follow this link.
- Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!
- If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mixx it!
Reddit

RSS