Since the Constitution was changed in 1913 to require the election of senators, a convenient interpretation of the language of the amendment has allowed governors over the years to appoint 188 men and women to the chamber. This undemocratic anomaly has generally gone unnoted, since gubernatorial appointments have rarely threatened to shift more than one state's seat in the Senate at any particular time. But with the incoming Senate narrowly divided between fifty-one Democrats and forty-nine Republicans, the sudden illness in mid-December of South Dakota Senator Tim Johnson, a Democrat who required emergency brain surgery, focused attention on the fact that one person--in this case, South Dakota's extremely conservative and partisan Republican governor, Mike Rounds--could make an appointment that would tip the balance of the Senate.

Such a circumstance could never occur in the House, where the Constitution unambiguously requires that open seats be filled by the voters.

Gubernatorial appointees do not always hold on to the Senate seats they are handed, but they go into the next regularly scheduled election with the advantage of incumbency. That means that the practical power of individual governors to influence the long-term makeup of the Senate is often much greater than that of voters.

Subscriber Login

User Name

Password

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

• Get The Nation at home (and online!) for 75 cents a week!
• If you like this article, consider making a donation to The Nation.