The Nation.



I Can't Get No Satisfaction

By Christine Smallwood

This article appeared in the December 11, 2006 edition of The Nation.

November 22, 2006

Once upon a time, half a century ago, American women washed dishes, packed lunches and, being good housewives, downed a pill or two to get through the day. Slowly, a panic overtook the gentler sex: Is this it? The dam broke open: Books were written, meetings were called, marches were marched. Rights--abortion, maternity leave, Title IX, sexual discrimination policies--were won. Brandishing said rights, women stormed the workplace, the halls of Congress, even the armed forces. And while inappropriate squeezes, delayed promotions and a few firings betrayed their second-class status, they persisted. They had arrived. Thirty years later, a generation of new women--young women--entered the workforce expecting to be treated as equals, despite--or was it because of?--the fact that they shaved their underarms. But they still only made 81 cents on the dollar of their male co-workers. They still had to do an awful load of dishes at night. And when there were babies to be had, well, they were the ones staying home and nodding off to Teletubbies. They were disappointed, and confused. Was this that glorious future that been promised them?

And then Laura Kipnis opened her laptop, and lo, it was good. Now the author of Against Love: A Polemic, a smart and brackish book that brought this hitherto unknown feminist scholar and video artist to the attention of The New Yorker and half the blogosphere, has struck again. Her new book, The Female Thing, examines the very question our tale leaves hanging: What happened to gender equality? Why has the movement that once seemed a matter of destiny kind of, well, broken down?

Kipnis turns a mirror on women, observing that if they wanted to smash the patriarchy, they probably could, given their sheer number--so could it be that maybe they don't want to? Perhaps, she ventures, women ought to stop blaming men and get reacquainted with the "collaborator within," the one who cleans feverishly, obsesses over her supposed flaws and maybe isn't so sure she wants to be liberated--whatever that means--after all.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Christine Smallwood

Christine Smallwood is The Nation's associate literary editor and co-editor of The Crier magazine. more...

Popular Topics
Most Searched

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Blogs

» Campaign 08

McCain Denies He Was Ever Reasonable On Middle East | "Are you now or have you ever been diplomatic."
John Nichols

» J Street

Friday Capitol Letter | This week's round-up from Washington.
Te-Ping Chen

» ActNow!

No European Star Wars | Czech hunger strikers challenge Bush plan to deploy missile defense system in their homeland.
Peter Rothberg

» Editor's Cut

Pentagon, Pimps & Propaganda (continued) | The incestuous relationship between the government, the networks and so-called “independent” military analysts reveals the essence of a new military-media-industrial complex.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Beat

California Decision Makes Same-Sex Marriage a 2008 Issue | Democrats need to recognize that social issues will be a part of the debate. And they need to get this one right.
John Nichols

» The Notion

Internet Gurus Flock to Harvard Conference | Blogging from the most important Internet gathering in the country.
Ari Melber

» Passing Through

The Disappearing Upper Class | Our focus on the "working class" vote highlights how oddly we use language to describe class in American politics.
Zephyr Teachout

» And Another Thing

Preachers and Politics | Secularism looks better and better.
Katha Pollitt