Nancy Pelosi is to be congratulated for her backing of John Murtha for the position of House majority leader. To be sure, this was partly payback to a political ally of the speaker-designate. Far more important, however, it was the first installment on a huge debt owed to the voters who swept the Democratic Party into control of both houses of Congress, based primarily on their frustration over the dismal war in Iraq.
More Info
Robert Scheer is editor of TruthDig, where this essay originally was published.
-
The Tortured Law on Torture
Robert Scheer: Those confessions elicited from Gitmo detainees are proving legally worthless--and an enduring indictment of the moral bankruptcy of George W. Bush.
-
Battle of the Hawks
Robert Scheer: In the increasingly unlikely event of a McCain-Clinton election, people who care about peace have serious reason to worry.
-
No Country for Old Men
Robert Scheer: Age is a factor in this race and nowhere is it so important as in McCain's vice-presidential choice.
-
The Intemperate Candidate
Robert Scheer: Hillary Clinton's intemperate remarks about "obliterating" Iran cloud her primary win with questions about her judgment.
-
The Man Who Would Be Bush
Robert Scheer: As millions surrender homes and sacrifice our nation's political reputation to the caprices of Bush and Cheney, a majority of voters say they might vote for John McCain. What are they thinking?
-
Painful Performance
Robert Scheer: By urging lawmakers to stay the course in Iraq, General David Petraeus remained loyal to his President, but failed the American people.
-
An Unreported Scandal
Robert Scheer: The Bush Administration has presided over the highest run-up in military spending since World War II. As our economy collapses, why can't the media connect the dots?
By contrast, his opponent for the House leadership position, US Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.), disagrees with 60 percent of the voters in continuing to support President Bush in this ever-deepening disaster. As recently as Monday, Hoyer continued to hold an allegedly moderate position that is as divorced from reality as the disgraced former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: "You can transfer authority to the Iraqis...but we need to do so in a way, hopefully, that will not create greater carnage," he told MSNBC-TV.
What gibberish. In fact, as realists from all sides of the political spectrum, including the President's father, argued before the war started, taking Baghdad was inevitably going to stoke the always smoldering nationalist and religious fires of the Middle East that now engulf Iraq with apocalyptic fury. The toll on Tuesday alone: Scores of scholars were kidnapped from the Education Ministry in a plot reportedly aided by policemen, while 82 others were killed or found dead from clashes, murders and bombings around the country.
What an insult it would be to voters to place a continued cheerleader for the war in the No. 2 spot in the House. To reject the basically conservative Murtha also would be to reject the votes of independents and Republicans who broke with Bush on the war.
"Your courageous leadership...changed the national debate and helped make Iraq the central issue of this historic election," Pelosi told Murtha in offering her endorsement. "It was surely a dark day for the Bush Administration when you spoke truth to power."
Yes, and he did so at a time when Hoyer, and all too many Democrats in Congress, still supinely were accepting or supporting the Administration's obsessive insistence that occupying Iraq is the best way to prevent terror attacks. The pro-war wing of the Democratic Party--which, sadly, still includes Sen. Joe Lieberman, who is threatening to blackmail Senate Democrats on the issue--is yet clinging to the neoconservative fantasy of a democratic, Israel-friendly Iraq that can serve indefinitely as a giant base for US troops.
In service to that quixotic quest, they will continue to stubbornly back Bush in his efforts to prolong the war until the end of his term, while pretending to check out the alternatives. Unlike the gruff Murtha, they will quibble about "redeployment" inside Iraq, creating new "benchmarks," "increased oversight," and even that old Bush chestnut, "we will stand down as they stand up."
All of which is just rearranging the proverbial deck chairs on the Titanic; the US presence is helping nobody in Iraq. Clarity of purpose in getting out of Iraq is all important, which is why the war's supporters are so desperate to smear forthright critics such as Murtha. Witness Dick Morris joining conservative commentator Sean Hannity in blasting Pelosi for backing Murtha: "He's a leftist, he's a cheerleader for MoveOn.org, and she could have chosen a centrist," Morris said on Fox News. "Instead, she chose the most left guy she could find."
Ridiculous. Murtha, a leftist? Maybe on Iraq, but his record on everything from abortion to gun control to Pentagon budgets makes him an old-school conservative Democrat in this country, as centrist as they come. Of course, pollster operative Morris knows this full well, because it was precisely why Murtha's call for withdrawal was such a political earthquake.
Pelosi, in supporting Murtha, rejected the path of opportunism that has so hobbled the Democratic Party in recent decades. If the Democrats fail to keep faith with the voters on the war, they can forget gaining back the White House in 2008, and it would be a rebuke much deserved.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Newsvine
Reddit
