A Win for Women

By Liza Featherstone

This article appeared in the November 27, 2006 edition of The Nation.

November 9, 2006

By a whopping twelve points, voters in South Dakota have rejected a draconian ban on abortions, which would have outlawed the procedure in every instance except to save the life of the mother. This was an important defeat for the grassroots right-wing quest to overturn Roe v. Wade. It had a spillover effect, too, costing Republicans a seat in the House of Representatives and several state legislators. The outcome was all the more welcome because the campaign was a critical test of prochoice strategy: Could democracy--something reproductive rights organizations have often feared--be a better guardian of our rights than the legislature or the courts?

"This has been such a judicially focused movement," says Lindsay Roitman, campaign manager of the South Dakota Campaign for Healthy Families, the coalition against the ban. Taking the abortion ban, which had been enacted by the legislature but was not yet in effect, to the voters, she says, was "a huge risk, one that people were questioning even until last week." The victory is even more impressive given that, as Roitman points out, "this is not just a red state but a deeply religious state."

What worked in South Dakota? First, prochoice activists paid close attention to local political culture and talked about things that mattered to fellow South Dakotans. "It was not 'Our Bodies, Our Choice,' or 'Get Your Rosaries Off My Ovaries,'" laughs Roitman. Instead, they emphasized the idea that government shouldn't interfere in deeply personal decisions. Second, good old-fashioned organizing worked. The Campaign for Healthy Families had more than 2,000 volunteers knocking on doors and standing on street corners. In every county where the campaign had an office and a grassroots volunteer operation, prochoice forces prevailed. Abortion "has been treated as such a black-and-white issue," says Roitman. "We got people to have conversations about the gray area."

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.

About Liza Featherstone

Contributing editor Liza Featherstone's work has appeared in The Nation, Lingua Franca, the San Francisco Bay Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post and Ms. She is the co-author of Students Against Sweatshops: The Making of a Movement (Verso, 2002) and author of Selling Women Short: The Landmark Battle for Worker's Rights at Wal-Mart (Basic, 2004). She is a Ralph Shikes Fellow at the Public Concern Foundation. more...
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Bread, Bombs, and the Big Stimulus | We need a smart and focused inside-outside strategy to revive our frayed social compact -- now more critical than ever.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Posted at 11:57 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

He's Baaaaack! Holbrooke, that is. | And right on schedule.
Robert Dreyfuss
Posted at 10:37 ET

» The Beat

Grijalva for Interior Secretary | Obama's considering an outstanding prospect for an important position.
John Nichols

» State of Change

Disappointment in Georgia | Palin's pick, Saxby Chambliss, wins the last Senate election of 2008.
John Nichols

» And Another Thing

Can you help "Nickie"? | Bringing the abortion debate down to earth
Katha Pollitt

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes