Bush Busts Unions

This article appeared in the October 30, 2006 edition of The Nation.

October 12, 2006

More than seventy years ago Congress designed the nation's basic labor law to encourage--not just permit but encourage--workers to organize and bargain collectively with their employers. More than any government since then, the Bush Administration has been committed to just the opposite--stifling the right of workers to organize.

Most dramatic, in an arcane ruling on what it means to be a supervisor, Bush's NLRB in late September took away the legal protection for millions of workers to join a union. It may count as the most significant assault on workers' rights since the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947, but it is perfectly consistent with other actions by this Administration. The NLRB had already restricted the right to organize of graduate student employees, temporary workers and the disabled, and Bush abolished collective bargaining for federal workers in Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration (and tried to do the same at the Defense Department). Add to this the fact that unionbusting employers enjoy virtual immunity, and it's clear why the ranks of the labor movement are thinning even as 57 million Americans say they would join unions if given a free choice to do so.

In its recent "Kentucky River" cases, named for a Supreme Court case on the status of supervisors, the NLRB ruled that workers like "charge nurses" at a hospital who give low-level assignments to co-workers count as supervisors and thus are not guaranteed the right to join a union. In 1947 foremen were banned from joining unions, but "minor supervisory employees" were allowed to keep their union rights. The new definition by the Bush-appointed majority would exclude about 8 million workers who exercise such minor supervision in industries from healthcare to manufacturing to construction, according to the Economic Policy Institute. The dissenters on the NLRB argued that as a result of this latest decision, most professionals--soon nearly a quarter of the workforce--could be denied the right to unionize.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» Editor's Cut

Bread, Bombs, and the Big Stimulus | We need a smart and focused inside-outside strategy to revive our frayed social compact -- now more critical than ever.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
Posted at 11:57 ET

» The Dreyfuss Report

He's Baaaaack! Holbrooke, that is. | And right on schedule.
Robert Dreyfuss
Posted at 10:37 ET

» The Beat

Grijalva for Interior Secretary | Obama's considering an outstanding prospect for an important position.
John Nichols

» State of Change

Disappointment in Georgia | Palin's pick, Saxby Chambliss, wins the last Senate election of 2008.
John Nichols

» And Another Thing

Can you help "Nickie"? | Bringing the abortion debate down to earth
Katha Pollitt

» The Notion

DC to Delhi: Only Our Missiles -- Not Yours | What is Rice going to say to India: only DC not Delhi is allowed to bomb Pakistan?
Laura Flanders

» Act Now!

World AIDS Day | How to help in the fight against the AIDS pandemic.
Peter Rothberg

» Passing Through

Forget GM's Plan -- Where's The Government's Plan? | Create a demand for green cars.
Jane Hamsher

» Capitolism

Is Personnel Policy? | How much do personnel choices reflect the Obama administration's policy direction
Christopher Hayes