The Nation.



Auto Recovery

This article appeared in the April 17, 2006 edition of The Nation.

March 30, 2006

When General Motors offered to buy out tens of thousands of older, high-earning factory workers in late March, the news was received with a combination of raw frustration and weary resignation. Labor's response was lukewarm: The offer was not generous enough ($35,000 to $140,000 per worker, based on seniority and age) to insure that the majority of employees would take it, though a sizable number are expected to. And the unions are braced for further cuts in wages and benefits of the remaining workers. Still, it is clear that without a union--and the threat of a strike--thousands of employees would have been permanently laid off with nothing to show for their loyal work.

The future of the entire domestic industry, however, remains in serious doubt. Its travails are commonly blamed not just on the labor-induced legacy costs of pensions and healthcare for retirees but also on a weak auto market. That part of the explanation invites skepticism. The sector barely felt the 2001 recession; sales haven't seen a sustained decline since the early 1990s. But domestic market share has taken a huge hit: 90 percent in the 1960s, and 70 percent as recently as 1986, it stands at 56 percent today. The unhappy fact is that American companies design fairly mediocre cars, and Japanese companies have no problem making good cars profitably here.

It's true that GM has to pay about $1,500 a vehicle in healthcare costs, more than seven times as much as its fast-gaining rival, Toyota. GM is carrying 460,000 retirees in the United States, almost thirty times as many as Toyota. Clearly, a little social democracy would do GM a world of good: A national health insurance plan and the socialization of pensions would lighten the company's financial burdens enormously (see Jamie Lincoln Kitman on page 4). The company would also be in better shape if the laws made it easier for workers to organize at rival nonunion plants and if local governments did not hand out giant subsidies for new auto plants with no accountability. These measures would help level GM's playing field with the factories of foreign automakers.

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» The Beat

Palin: “Just Trying to Give Tina Fey More Material" | Veep candidate declares Afghanistan "our neighboring country."
John Nichols

» Campaign 08

Nader on the Bailout | "Now Congress has engaged in its own sustained orgy of excess and reckless behavior."
John Nichols

» ActNow!

An Amendment Sarah Palin Must Love | A draconian initiative in Colorado would criminalize abortion, and deprive women of access to legal contraception.
Peter Rothberg

» Editor's Cut

The Bailout and Small-d Democratic Capitalism | The fight is on to put the public interest first while investing in people, productivity and opportunity.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Dreyfuss Report

Iraq Facing New Civil War, Insurgency | So much for John McCain's "surge" baloney. Will Obama call him out on this?
Robert Dreyfuss

» The Notion

Out of Money for the Next War? | How the financial meltdown is beginning to turn our world upside down.
Tom Engelhardt

» Capitolism

House Progressives Propose Bailout Alternative | A number of house progressives who voted against yesterday's bailout bill have just unveiled their own proposal.
Christopher Hayes

» And Another Thing

Are You the Very Model of a Modern Vice-President? | Sarah's not the only one with a special skill.
Katha Pollitt