Do you buy Dubai? That's this season's big hit, a zany farce with pompous officials in the Bush Administration and their hysterical courtiers in the mass media asserting positions that are patently absurd but hilarious to watch. Audiences are eating it up.
More Info
Robert Scheer is editor of TruthDig, where this essay originally was published.
-
The Tortured Law on Torture
Robert Scheer: Those confessions elicited from Gitmo detainees are proving legally worthless--and an enduring indictment of the moral bankruptcy of George W. Bush.
-
Battle of the Hawks
Robert Scheer: In the increasingly unlikely event of a McCain-Clinton election, people who care about peace have serious reason to worry.
-
No Country for Old Men
Robert Scheer: Age is a factor in this race and nowhere is it so important as in McCain's vice-presidential choice.
-
The Intemperate Candidate
Robert Scheer: Hillary Clinton's intemperate remarks about "obliterating" Iran cloud her primary win with questions about her judgment.
-
The Man Who Would Be Bush
Robert Scheer: As millions surrender homes and sacrifice our nation's political reputation to the caprices of Bush and Cheney, a majority of voters say they might vote for John McCain. What are they thinking?
-
Painful Performance
Robert Scheer: By urging lawmakers to stay the course in Iraq, General David Petraeus remained loyal to his President, but failed the American people.
-
An Unreported Scandal
Robert Scheer: The Bush Administration has presided over the highest run-up in military spending since World War II. As our economy collapses, why can't the media connect the dots?
Oh, to be Lou Dobbs over at CNN, who never liked anyone connected with the Mideast, including the President, and who now sends reporters out in the dark of night to track mysterious cargo. Some guys have all the fun--particularly those traitors who don't realize there is a war on and that it's our patriotic duty to support the President, even if he's endangering the country.
Now, maybe this port deal is not really that big a threat to US security, but then neither was Saddam Hussein. That didn't stop Bush from ripping up Iraq and turning it into a showcase for religious fratricide. So he makes mistakes, but he's our President and we are in a WAR, a War on Terror. Terror, terror, TERROR, all the time.
But now, we're getting mixed messages. First, the President told us that in a war on terror you trust your own government to provide Homeland Security. You put your faith in the stern, electronic wand-waving Americans in white shirts and TSA epaulettes who check your shoes at the airport; those upstanding Americans who report to other upstanding Americans, like Michael Chertoff, and people he trusts. Now they tell us it's OK to have some Arab as the guy in charge of checking our shoes--excuse me, ports?
Yeah, I know, to be the least bit queasy about turning over our ports to guys who supported the Taliban when that bunch of religious maniacs were harboring bin Laden is, as the Bush apologists tell us, just xenophobic. Dubai was not alone; Saudi Arabia and Pakistan did the same, and they are now trusted allies. These are crazy times, and there are some unnerving oddities in Bush's foreign policy, but don't worry: As soon as Hussein is tried and hanged, democracy will flower in the Arab world and the war on terrorism will be over. In the meantime, we have to put up with some contradictions, like trusting Arabs to own port-management companies, even as we scapegoat them everywhere else.
And even if you are a teensy-weensy nervous about it, remember that the Bushies have made it clear that the management companies don't have anything to do with port security, because that's safely in the hands of US Customs and the US Coast Guard.
Ooops, well, not according to the Coast Guard.
Just when things looked like they were quieting down, Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, chair of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, had to go and mess it up for the President by releasing details of a very embarrassing Coast Guard warning that the White House had ignored. "There are many intelligence gaps, concerning the potential for [Dubai Ports World]...assets to support terrorist operations, that preclude an overall threat assessment of the potential merger," stated the Coast Guard document.
No biggie. I get it, when it comes to national security, who are you going to trust, the President of the United States, our commander in chief or those sailor boys in the Coast Guard who are already backing off? But this is a very unpopular lame duck President, and some Republican legislators are getting nervous. For example Collins, who broke ranks to warn, "This report suggests there were significant and troubling intelligence gaps ... That language is very troubling to me."
Hey, no problem, reassures fellow Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona. It could be worse--the port managers could be Chinese communists! The Chinese are even less free than the people of Dubai, he insists, so we've dodged a bullet there. Some spoilsports might point out that Beijing never recognized the Taliban and hardly coddles religious fanatics. But that would ruin this wonderful farce, and I wish it a very long run. Do you buy Dubai? Yeah, loved every minute.

Buzzflash
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Newsvine
Reddit
