Handling Hamas

This article appeared in the March 13, 2006 edition of The Nation.

February 23, 2006

After it was conclusively determined that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the Bush Administration announced that the most important purpose of its invasion was to further the cause of democracy in the Middle East. It declared that stable, democratic regimes were the best deterrent to terrorism and the best hope for peace. WMD, it seems, stands for We Meant Democracy.

» More

  • Noted. Subscribe

    Philip Weiss on how grassroots activists on Capitol Hill trumped AIPAC to block a bad measure on Iran.

  • $700 Billion Question Subscribe

    U.S. Economy

    Government can soften the recession's impact by spending money--lots of it--to stimulate the real economy.

  • Noted. Subscribe

    D.D. Guttenplan on British politics, Nancy Kranich on Banned Books Week

  • Bailout Nation

    U.S. Economy

    What kind of government intervention will we have? Whom will it benefit? Ten observers on the right way to settle Wall Street's toxic debts.

  • Noted. Subscribe

    Tricky Dick Cheney, Canada Greens, the truth about the Rosenberg trial

  • Crashing the Election

    U.S. Economy

    Puncturing John McCain's Teddy Roosevelt persona will require brutal honesty from Barack Obama--about the causes of the crash and the regulatory solutions.

  • Nation Notes

Most Read

Issues »

A milestone in this march toward the open society was Palestine. The Administration supported the participation of Hamas in the recent parliamentary elections there, reasoning that the Islamist movement's widely predicted new role as minority party in the Palestinian Authority's legislature would help to tame its ideological rejectionism. But now, after Hamas's stunning triumph, the Administration has changed course, threatening the PA with diplomatic isolation and a cutoff of all aid unless Hamas recognizes Israel, renounces violence and agrees to abide by previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements. It has been reported that Washington and Tel Aviv are planning an economic destabilization campaign to force a collapse of the new government, though the Bush Administration has denied it.

Such a hard line is shortsighted and dangerous. Respect for the United States in the Muslim and Arab world, already at dismal levels, will plummet further if Washington refuses to accept the results of what were, after all, remarkably free and fair elections. US attempts to isolate and demonize Hamas will only increase public support for it among Palestinians. A cutoff in aid to the PA, whose salaries are the life support for several hundred thousand people, could cause both a humanitarian catastrophe and widespread violence. Threats to isolate the PA will only throw Hamas into the arms of other rejectionists like Iran.

A policy of cautious engagement, while not without risks, is much more likely to strengthen Hamas's pragmatic tendencies. The movement has made clear that it wants to concentrate on improved governance and continue the cease-fire with Israel, which it has held to with commendable discipline for a year. Hamas won the elections not because Palestinians want Islamist rule and the destruction of Israel but because of widespread public disgust with Fatah's corruption and mismanagement. Polls consistently show that a large majority of Palestinians want a two-state solution to the conflict. If the Bush Administration truly supports democracy in the Middle East, it will give Hamas a chance to fulfill these reasonable desires, and to succeed or fail on its own merits. That's the best hope for peace.

Most Read

Issues »

Most Emailed

Issues »

Popular Topics

Blogs

» Campaign 08

Free-basing McPalin | MoveOn feeds your head with the funniest ad of the race.
Leslie Savan
Posted at 2:56 PM ET

» Act Now!

Send the Next President to Poland | It's only the future.
Peter Rothberg
Posted at 12:49 ET

» The Beat

How to Fix the Debates: Better Moderators | The candidates need to be pushed and prodded. Who can do it? How about Amy Goodman? Pat Buchanan? Or Ralph Nader?
John Nichols

» The Dreyfuss Report

Iran Readies Its End-Game Iraq Strategy | Is it meddling? Or pursuit of national interests? We report, you decide.
Robert Dreyfuss

» Capitolism

A Well-Deserved Prize for An Outspoken Liberal | Paul Krugman, Nobel laureate. It has a nice ring to it.
Christopher Hayes

» Editor's Cut

Nation to New Yorkers: Vote Change Like You Mean It. | By voting on the Working Families Party ballot line, progressives can vote both for Obama and for the movement needed to push him.
Katrina vanden Heuvel

» The Notion

Is the Second Superpower of the Cold War Going Down? | The Soviets were bankrupted by an Afghan War that wouldn’t end. Now, is it our turn?
Tom Engelhardt

» And Another Thing

Are You the Very Model of a Modern Vice-President? | Sarah's not the only one with a special skill.
Katha Pollitt