Sex & GOP 'Values'

This article appeared in the March 14, 2005 edition of The Nation.

February 24, 2005

Mourning the loss of "moral values" voters, Democratic leaders have been softening the party's language on reproductive rights. In a recent speech, Senator Hillary Clinton called abortion "a sad, even tragic choice for many," praised faith-based programs and said, "the jury is still out" on abstinence-only education. New DNC chair Howard Dean, meanwhile, said the party ought to make space for "pro-life" Democrats and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has actively courted at least two of them for key Senate races in 2006. These gestures, along with the ascension of antichoice Senate minority leader Harry Reid, have prochoice groups rightly concerned about the party's will and ability to defend reproductive rights.

Congressional Democrats will need every ounce of party discipline and political nerve to oppose right-wing Republicans as they push for antichoice judicial appointments and fetal-rights bills that chip away at the already compromised right to abortion. In this context, seeking "common ground" on abortion by shifting from a prochoice message to one that emphasizes preventing abortions holds as much peril as promise. In the first place, it ducks the central question: Should a woman have the right to decide whether or not to bear a child? Rather than returning the "moral values" mantle to prochoicers, the common-ground approach cedes it to religious conservatives. It makes no sense from the standpoint of narrow political self-interest either. The prochoice position is a mainstream one, favored by a majority of Americans, even most Republicans.

If Democrats are going to talk about preventing abortions, they should point out the hypocrisy of the antiabortion crowd and the depth of their fanaticism. The assault not only on abortion rights but on family planning, sex education and HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention reflects a far-right cultural agenda that most people oppose. The Christian right has made real headway in its effort to install a theocratic and narrow vision of "family values" that punishes dissenters with unwanted pregnancies, disease and even possibly death. The Republicans have already defunded the United Nations Population Fund, reinstated the global gag rule and lavished tax dollars on abstinence-only

Subscriber Login

4 ISSUES FREE

Subscribe Now!

The only way to read this article and the full contents of each week's issue of The Nation online is by subscribing to the magazine. Subscribe now and read this article -- and every article published since for the past five years -- right now.

There's no obligation -- try The Nation for four weeks free.

.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Health Reform Foes Scream N-Word at Civil Rights Icon | "I haven't heard anything like this in 40, 45 years," says Congressman John Lewis. "Since the march to Selma, really."
John Nichols
94 Comments

» The Notion

Fox Flubs at Suspending Disbelief | Lately, 3D reality has been popping out of Fox's 2D world.
Leslie Savan
36 Comments

» Altercation

Slacker Friday | On health insurance, food insecurity, poverty and the mail.
Eric Alterman

» Act Now!

March for America | Organizers of this Sunday's immigration reform rally in Washington, DC are hoping that lightening strikes twice.
Peter Rothberg
44 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

GOP Peaceniks? | Some Republicans suggest that a "silent majority" of their party opposes nation-building and counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. So where are they?
Robert Dreyfuss
60 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Around The Nation | Welcoming our newest blog. Plus: Two must-see videos.
Katrina vanden Heuvel
16 Comments