Anonymous Detentions Ruled Legal

June 17, 2003

On June 17 a panel of the US Court of Appeals in Washington ruled 2 to 1 to allow the Justice Department to keep secret the names of hundreds of foreigners detained--sometimes for months--by federal authorities after the September 11 attacks. Last August a federal judge ruled in favor of a Freedom of Information lawsuit requesting the names, filed by the Center for National Security Studies, The Nation and other public interest groups. And in early June the Justice Department's Inspector General released a highly critical report noting that the detentions had been plagued with "significant problems," including possible abuse of the detainees. The appeals court majority, however, said that federal judges should defer to the Administration's argument that revealing the detainees' identities might compromise national security. In a blistering dissent, Judge David Tatel wrote, "Just as the government has a compelling interest in ensuring citizens' safety, so do citizens have a compelling interest in ensuring that their government does not...abuse one of its most awesome powers, the power to arrest and jail." The Center plans to pursue the case.

» More

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Blogs

» The Beat

Another Helping of FDR Please | Obama should follow the New Deal president's example and make his Thanksgiving Proclamation a call for economic justice.
John Nichols
61 Comments

» Editor's Cut

Filibuster Follies | "The filibuster has become a cancer growing inside the world's greatest deliberative body."
Katrina vanden Heuvel
92 Comments

» The Notion

Bad Black Mothers | For African American women, reproduction has never been an entirely private matter.
Melissa Harris-Lacewell
95 Comments

» Act Now!

Coal Country | Stunning film reveals new dimensions to the cost of America's over-reliance on coal.
Peter Rothberg
112 Comments

» The Dreyfuss Report

A Kingdom of Bicycles No Longer | China's ambassador for climate change speaks on the eve of the Copenhagen summit meeting.
Robert Dreyfuss
59 Comments